I don’t find much flaw in his analysis. People who support her put plumbing, politics and party over principle.
The headline is true.
I don’t know a single liberal that would change his vote to any Republican should Hillary be the nominee.
In fact, I still think she is electable because the Republican congress has, in two months, managed to cave to Obama multiple times and gleefully crap on the party base. It would take a miracle change in the GOP leadership to salvage the party before the next election. The GOP is toast.
Is it possible this this email issue is a diversion for the real problem:
That Clinton took millions of dollars from foreign/hostile governments WHILE SHE WAS SECRETARY OF STATE?
As I predicted...
Even if they find out that our enemies had access to all our State Department secrets all along, they will still excuse it.
-PJ
Can anyone say.. “they’re spinnin’ their A$$ off.”
The radical, mindless left is already shoveling as much dirt as they can on Hillary...but there is just to much “Clinton” all over her. There is no way to get it off -— the smell is too bad.
He is correct. It wont hurt with “Democrats”. The problem she will have is in the General election. She can’t evoke the passion of the Obama Voters and will suffer from a turnout problem from the Liberal Base. Romney had that problem with the Conservative base in 2012. The key to winning this election will be who the Republicans nominate. Stay tuned.
True dat. There could be photos of Hillary in bed with Raul Castro, Kim Jong-un, three underage girls, plague-carrying giant gerbils and it still wouldn't matter.
It going to take something like a Weimar Republic style hyperinflationary economic collapse before the free stuff army changes its voting.
If the GOP leadership collectively had a single brain cell, they would emphasize that the use of a private email service demonstrates that Hillary lacks the wisdom to hold higher office.
Hitlery and her fellow 'RATS know they have created a population stupid enough, gullible enough, and dependent enough on 'RATS such as herself to get through life that nothing she says or does will hurt her popularity with them.
I'm sure there are men out there who would be proud if Bill dropped his pants in front of their wives or daughters and asked them to "kiss it."
Michael Savage wrote a book called, "Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder."
Todd has provided living proof of it. He just doesn't realize he's a sufferer.
Stalinists don’t care about the past or lies. Do what’s best for The Party.
He might be right. Criminal behavior is resume enhancer for a Democrat.
We make fun of the RINOS for their capitulation, but frankly some of you here are acting the same when it comes to Hillary. You’re already giving up and the first ballots in Iowa aren’t going to be cast for another ten months. If that’s your attitude what’s the point of being the opposition when you’re assuming it’s all futile in the end. I’m glad Ronald Reagan didn’t give up after 1976 or else the conservative moment would of probably shriveled away. Look I understand why everyone is so pessimistic. We have a Democratic Party that breaks the rules, craps all over the constitution, and gets away with so much wrongdoing while destroying the country. We have a mainstream media that aids and abets them and we have an opposition party in the GOP that has a yellow streak a mile long and won’t fight back. Yes, it does look bleak but we have no choice but to fight. The liberals and RINOS aren’t going to fix this country. Only our side and ideas can save us. The country is too great for us to give up now. Let’s not give up or else we are done as a nation!
And why would they be?! Much of the MSM is ignoring it, and social media outlets are rife with attempts - Soros-funded, I'm sure - to invent Bush/Cheney scandals that they claim were far worse.
...their successes on social/economic issues speaks for itself.
...though none of these successes should come as a surprise, even Stevie Wonder could have seen these changes coming, with liberal indoctrination all but monopolizing media/academia over the last 50 years.
In the 50's this type of coercion/show of force was of course deemed...McCarthyism...
But McCarthy bad, Alinsky good.
...see, it's easy when YOU control the narrative isn't it?
Alinsky was/is their prophet.
Their opposition is, for the most part, getting too old or simply overwhelmed by the rapid amount of changes in society/elsewhere...cannot deny outright apathy plays a role also.
Of course liberals would deny all this "progress" as being man-made, instead they simply claim it is a result of a "natural evolution based on individual enlightenment"
Heh...nothing could be further from the truth...as this is/was a calculated social engineering experiment, geared toward the youth, who were taught to despise any/all traditional teachings and rational thought...and instead base everything on their "FEELINGS".
...of course, particularly when it comes to the youth, institutions like hollywood can twist reality in a way to instruct audiences what their "FEELINGS" should be, same in the academia world...this makes creating "the collective" so much easier, doesn't it?
...welcome to OUR utopia!(useful idiots)
He’s absolutely correct ... this won’t bother liberals at all.