Replies

The whole DC staffing industry needs a serious look. These are the completely unaccountable people who actually write the legislation that our congressmen don’t read and often don’t understand if they do read it. Most staffers are little more than in house lobbyists from various industries and advocacy groups.

When Hillary clinton was a senator she had more than 70 staffers with Huma Abdin leading the pack. Just take a look at former Clinton staffers and their employment histories. She’s just one example.

http://www.opensecrets.org/revolving/search_result.php?mem=Clinton%2C+Hillary

"...Reformicons push progressive policies with GOP branding..."

Sums it up, apparently. They aren't interested in reforming "RINOs", they are fine with them.

They are interested in reforming real conservatives.

The writer is ignorant of American History. What the so called reformicons seem to be advocating is old fashioned Henry Clay Whiggism. The Whig Party advocated that the federal government be active in promoting economic growth and commerce. In simple terms, set the conditions that would allow business and industry to flourish, like financing the construction of canals, highways, and railroads. Quite different from Jacksonian Democrats and Wilsonian Democrats. Jacksonian were more libertarian in their outlook on economics, and also favored agriculture over commerce and industry. Wilsonian Progressive diverged in their emphasis on social welfare, the beginnings of wealth redistribution instead of wealth creation. To say that the old Whig program does not work is to ignore the last 40 years of the 19th Century, the Gilded Age. Remember, upon the end of the Civil War the old Whigs, now Republicans, were solidly in control. They unleashed a stretch of economic growth never to be equaled, even by Reagan. They propelled an agricultural society into an industrial world power. Now I'm not sold that this is what is needed now, but I'm willing to listen to the arguments without dismissing them out of hand with comic book history.

“an entire reimagining of it.” I’ll go for that; I imagine several departments disappearing. I imagine multiple alphabet agencies also wiped out. Buildings sold; unemployed layers; lobbyists banned. Term limits; stringent ethics; no pensions for Congress.

Then, on the second day of my Presidency, I’d .......

The first time I saw the term “Reform Conservatives” was in “Commentary” magazine's email blog about a year ago.

Anyone remember when “National Review Online” started using the term “Crunchy Con” several years before that?

A “Crunchy” was supposed to be a “Conservative” who respected environmental concerns, and, who ate granola. In other words, they believe in man-made global warming.

How about George W. Bush, the “Compassionate Conservative?”

Those three political roads are all traveling in the same direction: To the Left, To the Left, To the Left.

Why can't RINOs leave the English language alone?

“Conservative” already has a clear political definition.

Go find your own word.