Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

British woman gives birth to her own grandson, acting as surrogate mother for her gay son
LifeSiteNews ^ | 3/11/15 | Thaddeus Baklinski

Posted on 03/12/2015 6:27:31 AM PDT by wagglebee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: RnMomof7

So true, Mom.


41 posted on 03/12/2015 11:34:32 AM PDT by Jaded (Really? Seriously?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Genetically they are not brothers, as I read the article.

A family of sick puppies that the poor kid has been born into, yes indeed...


42 posted on 03/12/2015 12:09:57 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (Don't be afraid to see what you see. -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

the LEFT is SICK! SICK! SICK!


43 posted on 03/12/2015 12:11:42 PM PDT by ThomasMore (Islam is the Whore of Babylon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

LOL!


44 posted on 03/12/2015 5:39:19 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (The greatest danger facing our world: the marriage of militant Islam with nuclear weapons.-Netanyahu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

That’s sicker than the teen girl who figured that it was okay to do it with her father. I mean really, just let your son go out and adopt a child rather than get pregnant with your own child’s genetic material, that already has half of yours.


45 posted on 03/13/2015 1:27:42 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CSM

It’s called, the kind of sorrow that people get when they somehow can’t have their desire from their own actions. The consequences are a $%^&$ to them.


46 posted on 03/13/2015 1:28:43 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

You have heard about artificial insemination, right? Call it what you may, but it is incest, even if it doesn’t involve direct sexual intercourse.


47 posted on 03/13/2015 1:30:37 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009

I would call it “incestuous,” but it is not incest.

In order to be incest, the process would have to involve intercourse between the mother and son, or the artificial insemination of the mother by the son, or the in vitro fertilization of an egg from the mother with sperm from the son.

None of those things took place.


48 posted on 03/13/2015 4:26:21 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

Your mixing the incredibly similar DNA of a mother and her son, thereby throwing forward all the same actual risks of genetically defective offspring that would happen by sexual intercourse. Screw the technicalities about actual sexual intercourse.


49 posted on 03/15/2015 3:06:30 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Homos are without doubt one of the most despicable lots on the planet.


50 posted on 03/15/2015 4:43:42 PM PDT by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson