Would the White House really try to get around the Constitution?

The Washington Post ^ | March 12, 2015 | Jennifer Rubin

[Timber Rattler]

Just like Obama's executive "memoranda."

Word games. That's all it is.

[Bob434]

[[the idea — bizarre as it may seem — is that the administration would go to the United Nations Security Council to pass the Iran agreement and thereby boost its status as enforceable international law. ]]

And the republicans do NOTHING about this treason?

[Harpotoo]

And then the next Secretary-General of the UN election will be postponed until 2017 so obama can be elected!-)

[kaehurowing]

The title makes it seem like it is a question.

It’s already done it, many times over.

[bgill]

Too late. They already have time and time again.

[Doogle]

..Where has MS RUBIN BIN for the last 6 years?...oh sorry, obviously under her editors desk

[Jack Hammer]

Waddya mean, “Would they”?

They’ve been DOING IT for six years.

As far as Obama is concerned, there IS NO constitution.

[TruthWillWin]

Someone that has to ask this question is an idiot.

[CyberAnt]

I was trying to show how ego-centric they both are.

Get it?

[CyberAnt]

And, I agree with you.

[Mr. Jeeves]

Obama (or more precisely, Valerie Jarrett) will not stop until somebody stops him. Why should he? Stopping would require a love of country and a respect for institutions that he has not once in six years shown that he possesses one milligram of.

Tom Cotton fired a nice shot across his bow the other day, and he reacted with the expected temper tantrum. We need to see much more of the same.

[Jim Noble]

Would the White House really try to get around the Constitution?

[JoeFromSidney]

In reality, I wonder why the US is negotiating a treaty with Iran. How is it our business to give or withhold permission to enrich uranium or operate a plutonium-producing reactor? The UN should be doing that.