You know it could also be that they don’t consider Hitlery radical enough. Hard to believe, but not so hard when you consider we have an Islamic enemy agent as President and an Iranian spy as his Senior adviser. Hitlery is a leftist, but in the end she’s not an enemy of the US like these guys, she just an inept cow only interested in herself. I mean did you ever think you would ever see the day where a Muslim President, his Iranian Senior adviser and a traitor to the US named John Kerry would be making deals with Iran over nukes? If we told people this right after Sept. 11th 2001 they would never ever believe it in a million years.
Exactly so, well put.
I have said for years that the grassroots of the Democrat Party will never trust a banshee from Illinois (by way of Arkansas) who served on board of directors of Wal-Mart for six years.
Re your post 7: You nailed it on several levels. Hillary is a leftist, but a self-driven, self-aggrandizing one. She’s married to good-time Bill. With Obama—it’s hard to tell whether making a billion in post-presidential speeches and playing golf is enough, or if he really does want the Mahdi-end times.
This. To many on the Left, Hillary Clinton is a textbook DINO. She may have a (D) after her name but in her cold, black heart, she's a Rockefeller Republican.
And while I by no means ever wish to see her in the Oval Office, if we were forced to suffer another Democratic administration in 2017, we could do far worse than Hillary Clinton. At least, she'd likely preside as a centrist, as her husband did after the Republican takeover in '94. I don't see a President Hillary Clinton trying to "fundamentally transform" America.