Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Just for the sake of debate, is the Secretary an appointee or an employee?


2 posted on 03/22/2015 9:20:24 AM PDT by buckalfa (First time listener, long time caller.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: buckalfa

Employee, unless she did it for FREE, and even then she would still be considered by the IRS as an employee for TAX purposes


5 posted on 03/22/2015 9:23:29 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: buckalfa

Herself, Madame Benghazi, the Cold & Joyless, would NEVER consent to being a mere employee. Herself was the BOSS, doncha know, and the rules did not apply.

A very finely honed sense of entitlement, yessiree, Bob.

Wonder if Condoleezza Rice could have gotten away with such a scheme? More to the point, would she ever have thought it up?


8 posted on 03/22/2015 9:29:32 AM PDT by alloysteel (It isn't science, it's law. Rational thought does not apply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: buckalfa

“Just for the sake of debate, is the Secretary an appointee or an employee?”
*****************************************************************************************************
ahhh...BOTH.


14 posted on 03/22/2015 10:18:06 AM PDT by House Atreides (CRUZ or lose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson