Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

Ansel, the costs are more, but if you consider an increase of 50% on 25% of the water you use, it brings the cost down to only a 12.5% cost increase overall.

It increases your total water available by 25%. That’s a very big help for only 12.5% increase in cost.

If you associate this cost with a duel purpose power plant, that 12.5% can be offset in part as well.

Thanks for your comments on the Santa Barbara plant. I wasn’t aware of that.


29 posted on 04/01/2015 12:25:04 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question is Jeb Bush. The answer is NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

“Despite these hurdles, however, the United States ranks fourth among markets for desalinated water behind Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Spain, according to an International Desalination Association presentation from 2011.”

http://www.bna.com/us-desalination-industry-n17179876105/


44 posted on 04/01/2015 12:46:26 PM PDT by ansel12 (Palin--Mr President, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson