Unfair? Bwahahaha, you write complete fiction and ascribe it as my postings then whine that I think you’re being unfair? How compeltely vaccuous. It is impossible to discuss a topic when one side is fabricating data points that they attribute to the other. Do you even know what ‘freefall speed’ means? I have not made one post stating how this event was carried out. I am absolutely convinced by the video data and the lies being fed to the public that the event was not what the government told the sheeple. And they have been quite successful in duping a large percentage of the po;ulace based upon how utterly clueless you remain.
If the fire didn’t burn hot enough to compromise the girders, what’s your explanation for the building failing?
If the building couldn’t fall as it did, what’s your explanation for how it fell that way?
You lay out a situation where only one explanation is reasoned, and then get upset when someone addresses that ‘one explanation’.
Either you believe what you say, or you don’t. Which is it?