[MHGinTN]

No, no I did not say a 747 loaded with explosives. The reference I made to plane laden with explosives was the notion put forth in the Operation Northwoods plan from the age of Cuban tensions, years before the towers were assaulted. I have already addressed the clumsily worded post.

You seriously want to claim the towers and seven 'pancaked down in collapse? Really? No, the buildings were not exploded. I do not believe they were controlled demolition collapsed either, with cutting explosives. I don't know the exact method used, but the idiocy of claiming the floors pancaked in collapse, the weight of the upper dustifying the floors one after the other is shear lack of Physics comprehension ... the towers came down at near freefall speed, an impossibility for pancaking mechanical energy. That you are unable to comprehend that is likely due to some bias toward what you want to believe rather than what the evidence shows. You have accpet a lie as to WHAT happened on 911.

[DoughtyOne]

I’m comfortable with you thinking that I am blowing it here.

I don’t think it’s out of line to think massive weight caused the floors to fail and collapse straight down.

The main architect of the Twin Towers is comfortable with the findings. He has surmised how and why the structure failed. He is saddened that his baby didn’t hold up, but I think it’s amazing it held together at all after the impact.

At any rate, thanks for you explanation.

Take care.

[lentulusgracchus]

Oh, for God's sake! What idiocy! You're an embarrassment to the entire Net.