Good. Then you will have Hillary instead.
No I will not have Hillary instead, besides what is the difference between once socialist and another. You remind me of the Bush lackeys on here saying Bush was a conservative.
Well how did that work out for you, great I guess because he isn’t and never was a conservative, and he gave us Roberts, who twisted himself into a knot to support ObeCare.
My position is the country is already finished, people vote for republicans who then betray the very oath they take.
Here you go, see what your valued Republicans are doing, http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3282592/posts these same republicans support Rubio’s position on immigration
That line does not work. If you are convinced Republican amnesty pimps are better for the country work to get Cruz nominated. W showed us Republicans can and will do more damage than Clinton did.
Mitch and the weeper of the house keep screwing us. Got it?
I see your point, TheCuban.
It is MUCH better when a Republican grants amnesty to 51 million illegal immigrants, than it is when a Democrat grants amnesty to 51 million illegal immigrants.
MUCH better.
The Senate Republicans will usually do the exact opposite of what they promise to do.
Those lame tactics won’t work, for Rubio or Jebster.
We’re not going to vote for national suicide, which is what amnesty for fraudulently documented foreigners is.