Deciding that a ‘right’ exists when it has never been mentioned until the last few years is really a stretch. So, the issue comes down to whether the courts are really about justice and judging or whether they are part of an oligarchy controlling the masses and the culture.
It would be nice to believe they are about justice, but any ruling in favor of calling a dangerous behavior a ‘right’ is a clear indication they believe they are part of a ruling class.
I've figured out which I think it is decades ago.
It would be nice to believe they are about justice, but any ruling in favor of calling a dangerous behavior a right is a clear indication they believe they are part of a ruling class.
I point out the fact that so often Supreme Court rulings have the same breakdown is evidence enough that something other than objectively applied law is at work here.