Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DarkSavant

What you propose is so drastic that it would never pass muster in today’s society. For one thing, both men and women are irresponsible so many women would just abandon the child or get abortions. The abondened child would be thrust upon her parents (which happens in large part today) or put in the government system of foster children/etc...

Basically that option is not that good either. It’s a bad siuation all around. I would propose that men get more rights in regards to being the primary parent. Why is it assumed that the mother will be the best parent by the courts?


9 posted on 04/27/2015 9:14:25 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Old Teufel Hunden
Basically that option is not that good either. It’s a bad siuation all around. I would propose that men get more rights in regards to being the primary parent. Why is it assumed that the mother will be the best parent by the courts?

I would go for this. Give men the choice of accepting custody or paying child support.

11 posted on 04/27/2015 9:21:45 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

Men have penises and penises cause men to abuse children—just like guns cause people to commit murder. Social Work 101, duh!

The entire system is set up as a matriarchy—literally. Not only do men not have civil rights, they often are denied status automatically—making them,in effect, non-persons. The civil “justice” system is neither. It is liberalism writ large.


15 posted on 04/27/2015 9:38:39 AM PDT by antidisestablishment (GOP delenda est!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson