Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer

Seems like the major problem is the meaning of “marriage”. Don’t “civil unions” already exist in which gay couples can have the same legal rights as a truly married couple?

Am I wrong? Are there legal rights available to “marriages” that aren’t available to “civil unions”?

I don’t closely follow this issue because only a small percentage of “marriages” are going to be homosexual. Heterosexual inclinations are still alive and well!


24 posted on 04/27/2015 12:31:55 PM PDT by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: cymbeline
I don’t closely follow this issue because only a small percentage of “marriages” are going to be homosexual.

This gay marriage movement has nothing to do with marriage; it is all about power. Gay marriage is an activist tool. They attempt to shame everybody into shutting up, especially christians and others who oppose their lifestyle. And they do this by punishing them. Take, for example, the baker who refused to bake a cake for a gay wedding. Not only have they totally destroyed the family's business through the imposition of heavy fines, they have now taken down a "GoFund" group attempting to raise funds in support of the bakers. I would encourage you to read the following:

10 Reasons Why Homosexual “Marriage” is Harmful and Must be Opposed

34 posted on 04/27/2015 2:03:51 PM PDT by NYer ("You are a puff of smoke that appears briefly and then disappears." James 4:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson