It's time for conservatives to abandon this absurd notion that the GOPe is small group and that the mainstream GOP is conservative, this simply isn't true. The GOP, almost to a man, DESPISES conservatives.
Many of us realize that the Democrats pander to minorities simply for votes and then immediately ignore them after the election, so why is it so hard for us to see that the GOP does the EXACT SAME THING to conservatives?
1 posted on
05/05/2015 6:35:05 AM PDT by
wagglebee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: metmom
Ping.
2 posted on
05/05/2015 6:35:32 AM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; AFA-Michigan; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Abathar; Absolutely Nobama; Albion Wilde; ...
3 posted on
05/05/2015 6:36:24 AM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
In a private e-mail exchange with a concerned parent, Republican state legislator Josh Byrnes of Iowa said there is nothing worse than homeschool parents making their views known on public school policy. People who home school their children, people who private school their children, are STILL BEING TAXED to pay for government schools. They're paying; they get to say how their money will be spent.
4 posted on
05/05/2015 6:37:11 AM PDT by
NorthMountain
("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
To: wagglebee
My experience is that those whose rail against bullying are, themselves, the biggest bullies.
Present exhibit: Home-schoolers should just shut-up and pay their taxes.
5 posted on
05/05/2015 6:39:25 AM PDT by
Arm_Bears
(Biology is biology. Anything else is imagination.)
To: wagglebee
A vote for anyone but the GOP candidate is a vote for Hitlery. Lol. /sarc
The sooner we wake up and realize the GOP, and anyone who continues to vote for them, are the problem, the better off we'll be.
7 posted on
05/05/2015 6:40:11 AM PDT by
dware
(The GOP is dead. Long live Conservatism.)
To: wagglebee
What he really means is: There is nothing worse than that queasy, guilty feeling that overcomes him whenever he hears from a constitutionally conservative constituent who sees through his act and recognizes him for the statist that he is.
9 posted on
05/05/2015 6:41:25 AM PDT by
WayneS
(Barack Obama makes Neville Chamberlin look like George Patton.)
To: wagglebee
If we want to follow this line of thinking to this logical conclusion, only those who pay taxes should have a say in how their taxes are spent.
Now THAT'S a "compromise" I could get behind. What about you, Rep. Moorman?
10 posted on
05/05/2015 6:42:20 AM PDT by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: wagglebee
The thought police are cranking up to full potential in Iowa, of all places.
11 posted on
05/05/2015 6:42:43 AM PDT by
arthurus
(it's true!)
To: wagglebee
The ruling class rightfully fears homeschoolers.
They are in the 85th+ percentile in academic performance,
have an average of 4-5 children per family,
and are 14 times more likely to be politically active than the general population.
12 posted on
05/05/2015 6:42:49 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: wagglebee
14 posted on
05/05/2015 6:45:41 AM PDT by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
To: wagglebee
No taxation without representation. There’s a bill that conservatives could wholeheartedly endorse.
To: wagglebee
I stopped getting GOPe mailers when I started sending them back with an invoice asking for all the money I gave them since 2008 stating they failed to live up to their expectations and I would not be supporting any RINO candidates any longer.
To: wagglebee
Nothing worse than homeschool parents trying to tell us legislators how to run public schools when they dont use them themselves, State Rep. Byrnes wrote.Then why not write a bill that exempts them from paying school taxes?
To: wagglebee
"The proposal would allow school districts to monitor students outside of school hours"
So, kids could be followed in to their church Sunday school class and monitored regarding any statements they made, in a Christian context, regarding homosexuality, Islam, marriage or Christ being the exclusive door to salvation.
To: wagglebee
> when they dont use them themselves,
No, they just pay for them.
23 posted on
05/05/2015 6:50:29 AM PDT by
ArcadeQuarters
("Immigration Reform" is ballot stuffing)
To: wagglebee
“The proposal would allow school districts to monitor students outside of school hours and punish or contact law enforcement officials and state bureaucratic agencies over any communication it deems bullying even if that behavior takes place inside a private residence or on social media. Some of these complaints may be filed without first notifying parents.”
If they can monitor kids outside of school, sounds like it does affect homeschoolers too.
The whole anti-bullying legislation is to get kids to accept homosexuality. No disagreement is allowed.
This is scary.
27 posted on
05/05/2015 6:58:08 AM PDT by
FR_addict
(Boehner needs to go!)
To: wagglebee
[School administrators could accuse a child of bullying if any comment dealing with sexual orientation and gender identity ]
Wow, this is beyond Orwellian.
29 posted on
05/05/2015 7:01:00 AM PDT by
DaxtonBrown
(http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
To: wagglebee
Nothing worse than homeschool parents trying to tell us legislators how to run public schools when they dont use them themselves, State Rep. Byrnes wrote.Let's follow that logic on a few other points:
- Nothing worse than tax consumers trying to tell us legislators how to allocate public expenditures when they dont contribute anything themselves.
- Nothing worse than anti-war activists trying to tell us legislators how to vote on issues of defense when they dont serve themselves.
- Nothing worse than anti-police activists trying to tell us legislators how to handle things in crime ridden neighborhoods when they dont live there themselves.
- Nothing worse than environmental exteremists trying to tell us legislators how to protect predatory species like wolves and coyotes when they dont live in areas or work in occupations impacted by them themselves.
We could make quite a list, couldn't we?
Plus the homeschoolers have more right to a say than any of the foregoing examples since they are taxed to pay for the public schools and impacted by the results.
31 posted on
05/05/2015 7:01:27 AM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: wagglebee
Homeschool families still pay for government schools and this policy would potentially bring scrutiny by government school officials on to homeschool kids and families. I’d say a homeschool parent would have every right to voice an opinion on this matter.
To: wagglebee
Dear Rep. Byrnes,
We may not use public schools but we pay for them via property taxes, therefore we do have a vested interest in how they are run.
Kalee
36 posted on
05/05/2015 7:11:52 AM PDT by
kalee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson