Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: artichokegrower
Newport News employees will continue the defueling process in the dry dock under the current $745 million inactivation contract.

What!?

The Original Cost to Build was $451.3 million!

Defueling and inactiviation costs 65% MORE than building her!

15 posted on 05/05/2015 8:02:16 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Talisker

That is the cost of working around 50 years of radioactivity buildup on all of those pumps, pipes, and valves in eight reactor plants. It must all be safely removed and put in secure storage before the other parts of the ship can be broken down for scrap.


17 posted on 05/05/2015 8:13:02 PM PDT by OldeGoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Talisker
Defueling and inactiviation costs 65% MORE than building her!

I'm surprised that Obama didn't sell her to the Chinese to save the bucks. (That's his mindset.)

20 posted on 05/05/2015 8:32:44 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Talisker

That is the cost of working around 50 years of radioactivity buildup on all of those pumps, pipes, and valves in eight reactor plants. It must all be safely removed and put in secure storage before the other parts of the ship can be broken down for scrap.


22 posted on 05/05/2015 9:11:02 PM PDT by OldeGoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Talisker
You forgot to consider inflation. $451 million in 1958 is almost 3.7 BILLION in 2015.

Yes, socialist FedGov policies have truly destroyed our currency ...

46 posted on 05/07/2015 1:05:19 PM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Talisker

Defueling is a straightforward and relatively simple process. It’s the dismantling of each of the eight reactor plants that poses serious challenges.

When a submarine is scrapped, the entire reactor plant portion of the hull is cut from the boat intact in one piece....welded shut on the ends, then sent to a lined pit at a facility in Washington State where it will ultimately be buried. The entire defueled reactor plant goes in-tact....vessel, pumps, valves, steam generators, everything.

The Enterprise is the first nuclear carrier, and the first to be scrapped. They are going into uncharted territory, with the pitfalls of having parts of the ship that have never been accessed or inspected since new construction. Each individual reactor plant (eight in all), will have to be cut out and sealed. Don’t know if there were provisions for this when the ship was built....but they may be having to engineer the process from scratch.

Then consider the logistics....the reactor plants are buried deep within the ship. I would assume it would be easier to cut up the portion of the ship above each plant before removal, but I’m not privy to the current plans. Either way, these things are very complex and require a great deal of planning and engineering, which is very expensive in and of itself.

I’m guessing the current projected cost is on the low side, and will probably rise significantly. But...much of the cost will be the learning curve, and later on down the line as more carriers are scrapped, the process will improve and cost less.


53 posted on 05/07/2015 2:10:49 PM PDT by rottndog ('Live Free Or Die' Ain't just words on a bumber sticker...or a tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson