Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Please help spread the word.

Parental Authority should not be terminated upon divorce.

Per U.S. Supreme Court, parenting is a 'fundamental right'. A State may not interfere with it except for good cause.

Even the Europeans, another Civil Code State, have a better law than the Louisiana Proposal.

Subscribe link for email https://gem.godaddy.com/redirects/1430879047-da8209e14353fe06bdd74f2f1376c4d3-1fe5d77?pa=30107097810

1 posted on 05/05/2015 8:41:22 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Pikachu_Dad

So the state can take over your children. This is for no other purpose.


2 posted on 05/05/2015 8:45:10 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikachu_Dad

37-0??

That is insanity


3 posted on 05/05/2015 8:45:25 PM PDT by GeronL (Clearly Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikachu_Dad

I don’t understand the reasoning behind terminating parental authority upon divorce, can you explain why they are doing it?


4 posted on 05/05/2015 8:45:49 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikachu_Dad

If parental authority is terminated so should child support and alimony.


5 posted on 05/05/2015 8:45:50 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GeronL; wastedyears; Excellence; ClearCase_guy; Render; foundedonpurpose; ConjunctionJunction; ...

lets se if this works... Ping?


8 posted on 05/05/2015 8:47:40 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad (Impeach Sen Quinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikachu_Dad

I don’t get it.


10 posted on 05/05/2015 8:49:10 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikachu_Dad

What in the name of all that’s logical are they thinking?? And I say this as a woman. I don’t understand at all.

No court should be able to terminate anyone’s parental rights without cause.


11 posted on 05/05/2015 8:49:20 PM PDT by Darnright (No, We Love Yeshua (Jesus).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikachu_Dad

Does Jindal have to sign off on this?


12 posted on 05/05/2015 8:49:47 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikachu_Dad

IF I understand this correctly I cannot see this law NOT being abused (most certainly) by the Left as good enough reason for it to be shelved by the House.

Some things are best left alone.


15 posted on 05/05/2015 8:52:50 PM PDT by rockinqsranch ((Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikachu_Dad
More power given to the Communist family court system. Any man who has gone
through this anti-male establishment understands. But now it goes against both
parents.

There is hardly any oversight in Family court, you get nothing from this system but grief.

18 posted on 05/05/2015 8:55:37 PM PDT by MaxMax (Call the local GOP and ask how you can support CRUZ for POTUS, Make them talk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikachu_Dad

Storm the statehouse with riot police to arrest all who voted for this atrocity.


22 posted on 05/05/2015 9:00:56 PM PDT by darkangel82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikachu_Dad

I am not a lawyer, but the article looked interesting so I did a little reading and I’m confused.

A summary of SB134 is here: http://www.legis.la.gov/legis/ViewDocument.aspx?d=944744. The Senate bill, with comments, is here: http://www.legis.la.gov/legis/ViewDocument.aspx?d=944623.

It seems to say that parental rights (of BOTH parents) terminate at divorce. This is existing law, the bill does not change that. Per Louisiana CC 131, “In a proceeding for divorce or thereafter, the court shall award custody of a child in accordance with the best interest of the child.” Other sections, not being modified, reference both sole and joint custody arrangements.

Can you point to the section in this bill which is causing concern?


33 posted on 05/05/2015 10:01:35 PM PDT by ConstantSkeptic (Be careful about preconceptions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikachu_Dad

If you are going to get a divorce and you have children, get the heck out of that State! This further discourages marriage!


35 posted on 05/05/2015 10:08:28 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikachu_Dad

How the hell did it pass?


36 posted on 05/05/2015 10:23:15 PM PDT by wastedyears (I may be stupid, but at least I'm not Darwin Awards stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikachu_Dad

For those who asked what they are missing, it is simply a clarification of long standing Louisiana law and a cleaning up of civil code and it’s ancillary (r.s. Chapter 9) language.

The concept is that joint parental authority is derived from the marriage. That joint authority, including the right to represent a child as embodied in civil code chapter 5 is terminated upon death, incapacity of a parent or divorce (when the judgement of divorce transfers it to one or both parents individually, as determined by the best interest of the child).

There is no change in the law, no sinister motive or hidden agenda.


40 posted on 05/06/2015 6:55:52 AM PDT by Sharkfish ( "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." -- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson