Skip to comments.
N.J. Senate committee advances bill to criminalize bestiality
the record ^
| 05.07.15
| DUSTIN RACIOPPI
Posted on 05/07/2015 6:51:15 PM PDT by Coleus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
quick, run for the nearest sheep before it's too late!! Sadly, this happens much too often.
1
posted on
05/07/2015 6:51:15 PM PDT
by
Coleus
To: Coleus
how islamic...is New Jersey these days!
2
posted on
05/07/2015 6:55:44 PM PDT
by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: Coleus
3
posted on
05/07/2015 6:58:27 PM PDT
by
P.O.E.
(Pray for America)
To: Coleus
New Jersey is a liberal, progressive state. So, they’re not about to be judgmental about who or what people prefer for their sex ‘partners’. It’s a matter of choice or freedom of choice, and liberals won’t get in the way. With liberalism, anything goes.
4
posted on
05/07/2015 6:58:40 PM PDT
by
adorno
(a)
To: Coleus
All the Animals are rejoicing!
5
posted on
05/07/2015 7:02:01 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: P.O.E.
6
posted on
05/07/2015 7:07:46 PM PDT
by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
To: Coleus
The offensive thing is that these laws used to exist to maintain some decency, but because there can be no morality, now they are passed strictly to protect the animals from assault. Because of course protection of animals is a high calling of the new order. Human morality is not.
7
posted on
05/07/2015 7:09:23 PM PDT
by
Williams
To: Coleus
So they intend to keep ManBearPig from getting his second Chakra released in New Jersey....
8
posted on
05/07/2015 7:09:27 PM PDT
by
MrEdd
(Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
To: Coleus
Based on Lawrence v. Texas (2003) and its progeny, this law might violate people's fundamental right to consensual sex with animals.
9
posted on
05/07/2015 7:13:16 PM PDT
by
Repeal 16-17
(Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
To: Coleus
MUZZIES will HATE THAT....
10
posted on
05/07/2015 7:24:42 PM PDT
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited (specifically) to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
To: Coleus
It’s trans-species-ophobia.
11
posted on
05/07/2015 7:28:38 PM PDT
by
Southside_Chicago_Republican
(If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.)
To: Coleus
Why? It’s only love. Who are we to judge?
12
posted on
05/07/2015 7:29:41 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: P.O.E.
I am going to have to borrow that one. I have some A&M friends.
13
posted on
05/07/2015 7:39:25 PM PDT
by
boycott
To: Coleus
They can’t do that! Depending on the Supreme Court’s decision they could be discriminating against someone’s wife or.............husband
14
posted on
05/07/2015 7:46:36 PM PDT
by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: Coleus
How can the state question who one can love?
15
posted on
05/07/2015 8:00:24 PM PDT
by
depressed in 06
(America conceived in liberty, dies in slavery.)
To: Coleus
Maybe they'll pick up on incest in another 10 years. "New Jersey does not apply any penalties when both parties are 18 years of age or older."
(But possession of a "high-capacity" ammunition magazine is a felony.)
16
posted on
05/07/2015 8:18:26 PM PDT
by
Sooth2222
("In a democracy people get the leaders they deserve." - Joseph de Maistre, 1753-1821)
To: Coleus
If the animal or creature dies as a result of the violation, it would be elevated to a third-degree crime three to five years in jail and a fine of up to $15,000. OK, but what if the human dies, as happened in the horse-mounts-man case in Washington State? His buddy finally took him to E.R., but it was too late (perforated colon). The victim died very quickly and his friend disappeared(later located)
No one was prosecuted, as I recall, because there was no law against bestiality in the state.
There is one now.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enumclaw_horse_sex_case
17
posted on
05/07/2015 10:01:48 PM PDT
by
skeptoid
To: Coleus
What right does a STATE have in defining relationships?
(how liberals see it)
Don’t be surprised if there’s a mass movement to repeal bestiality laws in 20 years or so - that is who these people are...that simple.
18
posted on
05/07/2015 11:02:03 PM PDT
by
BobL
(REPUBLICANS - Fight for the WHITE VOTE...and you will win (see my home page))
To: Coleus
Yeah. That is all fine and good, but what about trees!
19
posted on
05/07/2015 11:08:08 PM PDT
by
PA Engineer
(Liberate America from the Occupation Media.)
To: Coleus
Soooo,
sex with animals in New Jersey is a legal practice?
Somehow that doesn’t surprise me.
20
posted on
05/08/2015 2:53:53 AM PDT
by
Joe Boucher
( Obammy is a lie, a mooselimb and pond scum.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson