.
Posted on 05/14/2015 7:09:07 AM PDT by HomerBohn
Look at grandpa left hand and his right hand, the first finger of both hands are of the same person, that's all I am saying. I don't know where they got the photo of the floating hand but it does look like grandpas hand.
.
As to the birther designation, I'm sure sighing non-birthers can happily produce a Columbia College yearbook with Obama's photo (there must be hundreds among the grads) or explain how it is that a self-described mediocre student gained admittance to Harvard Law. How about $500 to your favorite charity for a photo of Stanley Ann Dunham pregnant with the future President?
“Why sigh? If the E.O. is used as cover to totally keep any records from being released by any relevant party, then just the threat of potentially violating an E.O. works. “
Except, the E.O. in question has nothing to do with the types of records you’re talking about.
“The word should be photoshopped.”
Actually I’ve seen “Photochopped” used to describe a bad Photoshop job.
What is this “photochopped” that is continually referenced?
Like a bootleg version of Photoshop or something?
Actually I’ve seen “Photochopped” used to describe a bad Photoshop job.
It seems that the present recumbent of the WH ... Yes! Our POTUS! may be some sort of impostor. However, I have it on super secret inside info that he may be for real, but that his double may be an impostor. I also have it on good authority that the Obama Family Version of Photoshop Lite was recalled a long time ago.
As far as the "family" pictures go, I am just grateful that they have any at all. It's sort of like those instant families in the ready-made picture frames, which as a kid I thought were for people who had no relatives.
Nah, it’s more an indicator of ignorance.
Let’s all expect someone who cannot spell a thing to be an expert on it.
Yeah.
Zoom in onto her elbow. The row of bumps around her elbow aren’t grey like the wall but are pink. Those 4 pink bumps are grandpa’s finger tips.
The snarly look is definitely her.
Anyway...I tried to give the person who took it the benefit of the doubt...that it was a pic of lightning in which the camera was shaking and it made a swirling pattern.
I'll try to find it and will send you the FB link in a PM.
All of their *family* pictures look fake (except for the scowl on her face. THAT’S real.). Every time I see a picture of him he looks like a cardboard cutout of himself.
P.S. Next time I have the hiccups I’m going to look at the pics you posted.
That's the widest shot I could find of the original image. Note the depression in the wall at Stanley Armour's shoulder. Note the course of the mortar in the wall blocks. His hand supposedly on Madelyn's shoulder has his fingers in exactly the same position as his other hand, but the hand appears to have been reversed. Check the fingers.
Now we have a man sitting close to the place where Madelyn was shown sitting. From this you can compare the course of the wall blocks/mortar, which doesn't appear to match the previous image. The bump is still in the wall at the top, and it's the same tree, the tree seems to be a little further to the right, but it's grown in the time between the photographs.
Phil removed zero (and the tree)and that shows how the Dunhams were probably shown sitting side by side, but there's the question of where? The Dunhams might well have been placed in that position and the wall blocks needed 'reconstruction' to accommodate the third party. Have I put that badly? Maybe. There was a wall, there was a tree, there was an image of the Dunhams, they were separated, then zero was placed between them. However, if the Dunhams had never been photographed on that bench, then the wall would not have needed 'reconstruction' - would it?
The location from another angle. How does this need fit into the narrative? Are we being shown a relationship between zero and the Dunhams which no longer existed?
Apologies to those who abhor my penchant for images. There's really to other way.
Same day in Central Park, same clothes. One of several poses on that bridge would have provided an image that fitted nicely between the Dunhams. Note the strong sunlight on his left hand in the three-party image.
Those aren’t good enough to be modern Photoshops. This is KGB stuff from the 80’s. Tantalizingly close to concrete proof that Obama is a mole.
Now I know these people are sloppy, at best. We proved this was not another airport.
Here is an archive photo of the Honolulu Airport in the 1960's, at the Pan Am ticket lobby. Look familiar? Same lighted wall sign? Same bent counter pole? The San Francisco sign this author references is the counter sign for San Francisco bound flights. This photo shows the Los Angeles ticket counter.
This picture is from the Hawaiian aviation historical photos from this site .
-PJ
Yes! Exactly. Wild, isn't it?
He probably gets paid to post that kind of crap.
Yeah, and any Republican candidate they’ll go clear back into the womb to find dirt.
All of them in Washington dc are in on it.Jmo
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
