Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki

I was working on this 20 years ago. Its very frustrating the the U.S. hasn’t universally fielded helmet mounted sights.

I can see an issue with the bay mounted missiles in the F-22 and F-35 as the fully gimballed seeker can’t look through the airframe to sync with the off axis sight, but that is another matter.

And whatever happened to fighter designations 24-31 and 33-34? Yes, I know some X-planes used those numbers, but most are out of sequence in their timing and the X-22 has nothing to do with the Raptor, although a few X designations do correspond to developmental aircraft. Designations haven’t made any sense for 30 years.


6 posted on 05/18/2015 6:30:11 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SampleMan
And whatever happened to fighter designations 24-31 and 33-34? Yes, I know some X-planes used those numbers, but most are out of sequence in their timing and the X-22 has nothing to do with the Raptor, although a few X designations do correspond to developmental aircraft. Designations haven’t made any sense for 30 years.

See "Missing" USAF/DOD Aircraft Designations

Basically, the X-35 should have been called the F-24, but DOD abandoned the naming convention for the Lightning II and stuck with it's X plane number 35.

7 posted on 05/18/2015 6:45:56 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson