[Mr. K]

I won’t discount the possibility that the Dems want to lose this one, because they have steered this ship right at the icebergs, and want a different captain on board when it sinks.

[GrandJediMasterYoda]

Yep I was thinking that as well. They want to pull the same crap they pulled on GW when 911 happened. 8 years of Clinton getting BJs while Bin Laden amassed and prepared his army of Islamo Nazis and the second GW comes into office "Oh it's all his fault because he would rather read to school kids" To this day I still read about liberals blaming him for 911 using that school reading excuse. They are going to do the SAME thing to the next POTUS. It will be a Republican and he will be in office a few months, the Islamo Nazis will set off a nuke and once again they will point fingers while calling Obama "the greatest POTUS ever".

[Louis Foxwell]

Long term tactics lend credibility to this scenario. Marxism is not a short term program. It will be a simple matter for the dems to blame pubbies for everything that goes wrong in the next presidency. There will be plenty of catastrophes all laid down and become inevitable under Obama.

[NFHale]

Hard to argue that logic. You make a great point. They did exactly that to President Bush.

[V K Lee]

Point well taken.

[X-spurt]

Since I have been old enough to observe national politics, every time the dems hold the reins they steer us right toward the rocks. This is inevitable considering their primary goal is raiding the Treasury through every means possible.

By the time they have cleaned out the cash drawer, our nation having been in “Elite Intellectual” drift will either crash on the rocks or let someone more conservative take the helm for just long enough to get away from the wreck and rebuild the Treasury to get ready for the next dem fake penny Anny voter give-away grifter raid.

Its not that the next dems want to lose this election, they simply know there is too little left to grift. This is why we see so few dems running in 16.

Hitlery is a worse campaigner than even old Adli Stevenson, the dems are happy to let her run in this no win year. Slick is happy to see her fall on her butt, just to prove she is not his equal.

[goodnesswins]

Yep...as soon as a GOP is elected the bureaucracy and “Dems” pull out all stops on economic reporting of what is actually happening...and blaming GOP

[EQAndyBuzz]

“I won’t discount the possibility that the Dems want to lose this one, because they have steered this ship right at the icebergs, and want a different captain on board when it sinks.”

Ala, GWB with 9/11. It’s going to hit us again and they want no part of it.