Might as well go all the way and eliminate the word ‘Marriage’ from the term, and just call it ‘Partnership Contract’.
I'd call it a "civil union" since they already have that legal term (and it's more polite than the more accurate term - "perversion pact").
“Might as well go all the way and eliminate the word ‘Marriage’ from the term, and just call it ‘Partnership Contract’.”
There is nothing wrong in what you suggest. A legal incorporation of assets can occur, which makes everything a matter of civil law.
The word ‘marriage’ then contracts back to its original definition - a sacrament - instituted specifically and carefully by Christ Himself.
It’s going to wreak havoc on the family court system, which was due for an overhaul anyway.
I listed to Rush today for all of five minutes. What a great show he’s got - he was on a point about how some foaming feminzzi was upset about how Elton John’s spouse(?) indicated he was white on a birth certificate.
How this ties in was due to the fact this person is claiming that somehow men are taking motherhood over, and away, from women.
What struck me was how I’d never thought about all of this ‘liberation’ in that context. I believe men can’t do what women can do in raising kids, and vice versa.
However, perhaps all of this robotics bodes ill more for women than men. If you can grow people in artificial wombs, then why would you need women?
Our children are about to enter a very confusing, perhaps inhuman, phase.
If you get married by a minister/rabbi/etc, it can be called a marriage?