Posted on 05/29/2015 7:13:27 AM PDT by Kaslin
I would say it is the other way around..and she frightens EVERYONE!!!
Why do Democrats keep giving Republicans political advice? Why do Republicans bother to listen?
Hillary fears Rubio most? That sounds like Brer Rabbit pleading not to be thrown into the briar patch. Marco Rubio is an amnesty shill and the GOPe’s reserve candidate (for when Jebbie fails).
Old bat..and thats an insult to bats.
Is it because of his dark skin?
“Hillary Clinton is an embarrassment with riches. She has lots of experiences, not all of them good.”......
And I will state, she will get the demodummie “nod” as their best candidate and even worse, she may just win. Liberals wound still support her as she is led to the gallows, which she should be.
Good line.
And yes, Marco does frighten Hitlery.
Marco, if he could stay true to conservative principles, could engage and bring the Republican party into a prominent position for many many years.
Big if.
The thought of Rubio in the Whitehouse frightens me. :-)
**As the youngest candidate in the field, he highlights the age problem Hillary confronts.**
Why does this keep being said about Rubio?
Rubio and Cruz are both 44 years old, with a 5 month difference in age.
I contend that she doesn’t even make it though the nomination process!
I’m hearing a lot about Brer Rabbit these days and it leads to this question. If they are right and Rubio would be more competitive against Clinton than Cruz would be, should we go ahead support Cruz anyway, knowing we could lose? I know that’s a big if and most here will contest the premise, but in statistics there is always a chance something will happen.
Hillary should be in fear of the dark and justice that is coming. The Clintons work hard for there father Satan.
Does a Young Rubio Frighten an Older Hillary?
No, but a young TED CRUZ does.
Why would it? Because he'll get the top of the 'RAT ticket, and she'll get VP nod?
They don’t want the first Hispanic nominee to be one of ours, that’s for damn sure.
You got that right, so screw em who cares what they want
The author, Suzanne Fields, has been a hard as nails conservative columnist for decades. I was reading her in The Washington Times before the dawn of the internet. She’s no one’s (but yours, apparently) idea of a “Democrat.”
I can’t understand why so many FReepers are averse to just reading or hearing that Rubio is extremely popular outside these boards. He may not be your or my candidate, but he IS extremely popular. That is the reality. And he would worry Hillary more than the others because his major electoral assets are way too similar to Obama’s in ‘08. Deal with it, and get out to work for your candidate.
I’ve been here since 1997, this is my fifth presidential campaign at FR. This place goes a little crazy every four years. I’ve learned to duck and cover.
Ain’t that the truth !?!
I wasn’t referring to the author. She was writing about what Democrats say about Marco Rubio.
In regards to Marco Rubio, he’s a proven amnesty shill.
http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/schumer-rubio-immigration-is-worse-than-obamacare/
You may not care about Rubio’s positions on immigration, but his work with the likes of Chuck ‘The Schmuck’ Schumer and John McPain to pass an amnesty is not something that I’m willing to forgive.
BTW, I understand Marco Rubio is popular in some quarters. If that support comes from professed conservatives, I consider it irrational. In what way does “running with RINOs” count as being a conservative hero?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.