Why does the Judge get to overrule this?
We had the same problem with 187 in California.
9th Circus Court of Appeals strikes again.
Asked for a comment on this ruling, Governor B*tch Otter curled up into a fetal position and crawled under his desk.
9th Circuit, nothing rational comes out of there.
Insane.
It’s futile to ask “Where do they find a Constitutional justification for this?” because the answer is “Wherever they want to.” I do not know if the state intends to appeal to the Supremes or if the latter will even hear it.
....and where in the U.S. Constitution does it confront that?
I don’t know exactly what the judges said, but patriots need to exercise their voting muscle to require that judges start referencing specific clauses, sections and articles in the Constitution to justify their decisions instead of pulling the wool over the eyes of low-information citizens with the vague, PC terms “constitutional” and “unconstitutional.”
Regarding the so-called “constitutional” right to have an abortion, the reality is that pro-abortion activist justices got away with legislating from the bench the so-called “right” to have an abortion. They got away with doing so because they know that low-information citizens don’t understand the significance of constitutionally enumerated rights. And the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect abortion as a right.
Unconstitutional?? Why then has “Of The People, By The People and For The People” not been specifically ruled unconstitutional? Per the ruling of liberal US courts, so much for preserving the sanctity of human life.