To: GIdget2004
A victory for religious freedom. Let’s hope there’s another one forthcoming.
3 posted on
06/01/2015 7:23:32 AM PDT by
Wolfie
To: Wolfie
The problem is....the head scarf is not really part of their religion. It’s a custom....and no more.
To: Wolfie
“religious freedom” doesn’t mean what you think it means.
34 posted on
06/01/2015 7:39:27 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: Wolfie
"A victory for religious freedom. Let’s hope there’s another one forthcoming."
Don't get your hopes up. This was an easy call for the court: 1. It involved a Muslim, not a Christian; 2. It did not involve gay rights or birth control; and (3) The defendant was a private corporation.
To: Wolfie
To: Wolfie
A victory for religious freedom. Let’s hope there’s another one forthcoming. Another defeat for property rights. There is little hope that more will not be forthcoming.
To: Wolfie
88 posted on
06/01/2015 8:19:06 PM PDT by
Mmmike
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson