Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley

Due to the religious basis for the headscarf one truly has to wonder how scotus thinks the Fed can force businesses to violate their religion but businesses can’t do the same with their employees. It’s the first amendment on it’s head. “Business shall make no law regarding an establishment of religion, nor denying the free exercise thereof.”

That must be how it actually reads.


23 posted on 06/02/2015 5:56:37 AM PDT by xzins (Donate to the Freep-a-Thon or lose your ONLY voice. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

“Due to the religious basis for the headscarf one truly has to wonder how scotus thinks the Fed can force businesses to violate their religion but businesses can’t do the same with their employees.”

I’m not a lawyer but I get the sense that society and in turn the courts are beginning to move away from viewing a business as having personal rights. They will eventually be some other kind of entity with few protections, just mandates.


28 posted on 06/02/2015 6:25:32 AM PDT by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson