Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What if the White House Wins the Next Supreme Court Obamacare Case?
National Journal ^ | 06/04/2015 | CAITLIN OWENS

Posted on 06/04/2015 7:00:18 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Don’t underestimate the political implications if the Supreme Court sides with the administration in King v. Burwell.

If the Supreme Court later this month strikes down Obamacare subsidies in states with federal insurance exchanges, the narrative is simple: The health care law could be fatally crippled and marketplaces will fall into 34 simultaneous death spirals.

But what if Obamacare's conservative challengers lose King v. Burwell?

If that question seems less sexy in a policy sense, that's because it is. Essentially, if the Court decides the federal government is on the right side of the law, nothing happens; business continues as usual in all 50 states' Obamacare exchanges. People keep their insurance as is.

But politically, an Obama administration win would mean volumes.

The decision would validate the White House's faith in the president's signature domestic accomplishment. And it would give Democrats the platform to say some variation of "I told you so" after standing their ground over the past couple of months, refusing to engage in conversations asking how they would fix Obamacare because, as they keep repeating, the Court isn't going to break it.

For Republicans, aside from the disappointment of losing their second Supreme Court challenge against the Affordable Care Act in three years, they would lose perhaps their only true bargaining chip—the health insurance of some 10 million people—against the White House to make any substantive changes to Obamacare this year.

So the focus would shift to 2016.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationaljournal.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: obamacare; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 06/04/2015 7:00:18 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Then words have no meaning.


2 posted on 06/04/2015 7:02:35 AM PDT by Ray76 (Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Even if we lose, Obamacare has started its actuarial death spiral. Take your spoonful of ugly now, or take it later.


3 posted on 06/04/2015 7:03:50 AM PDT by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What if, lol, they have already shown Roberts the pictures again just in case he is feeling any remorse over the last vote on Odumbo Don’t Care


4 posted on 06/04/2015 7:08:23 AM PDT by stockpirate (A corrupt government is the real enemy of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

Then words have no meaning.

************
And the law comes down to attempting to divine “intent”. Its not what you said, its what you were thinking (at the time). This is legal madness.


5 posted on 06/04/2015 7:09:44 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Even if we lose, Obamacare has started its actuarial death spiral. Take your spoonful of ugly now, or take it later.


6 posted on 06/04/2015 7:10:28 AM PDT by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

What you said.


7 posted on 06/04/2015 7:10:44 AM PDT by OKSooner (Chamberlain at least loved his country, please don't insult his memory by comparing him to 0.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DaxtonBrown

Yup, the most likely political fallout is that Democrats will realize they’d lost their last chance to have SCOTUS take them off the hook for what is about to happen.


8 posted on 06/04/2015 7:11:09 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ray76
-- Then words have no meaning. --

It's been that way for some time now. Words have whatever meaning suits SCOTUS. Penumbras, emanantions, tax/not-a-tax, and so forth.

9 posted on 06/04/2015 7:11:49 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It will eventually come down to the states growing the fortitudinal spherical parts to nullify bad federal law.


10 posted on 06/04/2015 7:12:50 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

A few “visual reminders” might be in order to refresh his memory and make sure he remembers to vote the right way. This is how Chicago politics works.


11 posted on 06/04/2015 7:13:02 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DaxtonBrown

We lose either way. If it is shot down, Republicans will quickly come to the rescue. Count on it.


12 posted on 06/04/2015 7:14:32 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Obamacare is a disaster anyway you look at it. All it has done is forced people to buy something they can’t afford at all in most cases, the cost of insurance has soared many times over, its forced many doctor’s abandon the field or made them refuse to accept it because the payment structure is so low they can barely affird to keep their offices profitable on it, its forced people to pay for “junk” they should never be forced to for other people, and on top of that people are penalized for something they couldn’t afford in the first place and the exchanges have so many software glitches no one wants to enroll in them. I believe its real function is not only to generate additional revenue for the government but to increase profits for the insurance companies like mandatory automobile accident insurance did and act as a data collection point for people’s personal information fit amuch more nefarious use later (NWO).


13 posted on 06/04/2015 7:14:56 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They would never allow this to stand...... Oh, wait?

*&%#% (*&%^$#


14 posted on 06/04/2015 7:19:22 AM PDT by Duckdog (If it wasn't for NASCAR my TV would have gone out the window years ago!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I have little faith in the SC making any lawful Constitutional judgment. It will be shi! either way, we crash.


15 posted on 06/04/2015 7:19:23 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Just as in the “Bankruptcy” of GM, they will ignore the law, and abide by what ever whim they see fit no matter what the ruling.

We have become a lawless land, at least for the wealthy and elite ruling class.
The fact that the scum bag bottom feeding Hillary is still campaigning and that Bill, Hubbels daughter and Hillary are not locked displays just how perverted the judicial system has become.

Until the people rise up and do our duty to protect and restore the Constitution we have no place to appeal.


16 posted on 06/04/2015 7:20:22 AM PDT by Romans Nine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

...so luscious

17 posted on 06/04/2015 7:24:03 AM PDT by JPG (Lefty reporters doing battle with Sen. Cruz will continue to be chewed-up and spit-out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

‘then words have no meaning’

Already done. The word ‘marriage’, for MILLENIA, has meant the ‘union of one man and one woman’. Words are subject to ‘reinterpretation’ whenever a Leftist chooses.


18 posted on 06/04/2015 7:25:55 AM PDT by originalbuckeye (Not my circus, not my monkeys.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

Correct.

Consider the ability to leverage such a ruling to expand the already distorted “intent” of the “promote the general welfare” clause of the Constitution’s preamble, for instance.

In theory it can be used to justify all sorts of things. To the long of overriding the rest of the Constitution and Amendments.

And I’ve seen Progressives in discussions claim exactly that.


19 posted on 06/04/2015 7:26:00 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JPG

Are you saying that the Chief Justice Roberts is gay?


20 posted on 06/04/2015 7:34:11 AM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson