Remember how in 1998, after he testified in Kenneth Starr’s investigation, he came out and lied blatantly about what he had been asked in the closed session.
Although Blumenthal was banned from govt employment, from his paid perch as her employee at the Clinton Foundation, he sent Secy of State Hillary memos on Libya that she forwarded (unattributed and unquestioned)....even as Blumenthal's agit-prop caused eye-rolling among State Dept pros.
Hillary portrays herself as the picture of openness, that she wants her e-mails public as soon as possible. But the Clinton-Blumenthal emails were cleansed off her server until a Romanian hacker came forward.
The Clinton Foundation slush fund---AKA a "charity"---is now exposed as a holding tank for Clinton political operatives.....looks like the various "Clinton charities" are uninformed about the Foundation's aiding the Clintons scheme to return to power.
Blumenthal was sending Hillary memos about Libya at the same time that he was in league with people trying to make money in Libya. Did Blumenthal’s would-be business associates get together and say: “We need to find the best expert we can on North Africa, someone who understands the subtleties of Libyan politics: "Let's get Sidney Blumenthal."
More likely it was: “We need to find someone who has a back channel to Hillary so the State Dept will give our venture the most favorable possible consideration. Let’s get Sidney Blumenthal!” (EDITED EXCERPTS---RICH LOWRY---NY POST OP-ED)
So, this time it'll be different (/sarc).
OK, somebody help me out here: Is there a Conservative on that Committee that has balls? Somebody who will not let Blumenthal weasel? Plz don’t say Trey Gowdy. He’s basically just a media whore. He didn’t have the balls to show up when the vote on the Speaker took place. Screw him and his funky hair-do.