You are missing the point...
Charles pointed out that a measure (bill) proposed in S.C.’s legislative body, that would have tweek’d the existing law to allow no penalty to carry a concealed firearm into a church in S.C. was given a “nay” vote by this pastor, that just also happens to be a S.C. state Senator...
The pastor did not have an “opinion”m he was elected to a state office to debate, and vote on measures, bills, in the conducting of state business...
It IS NOT implying that if someone in that room had had a firearm would have stopped the massacre...That is not part of the overall problem here...
I probably need more coffee, Stevie. :)