Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
But our iron was stronger than their iron. And there was a lot more of it.

Good point. One thing I've been considering reading these articles is, knowing the American Way of War places so much emphasis on artillery firepower, just how much ordinance did we expend in those 82 days?

Keep in mind that every Japanese target on Okinawa was within reach of naval artillery. For shore bombardment, nothing on land can match the power of battleship or cruiser guns. The most common heavy artillery is the 155mm, and medium artillery was the 105mm gun. A battalion of such guns was three batteries of four guns, or 12 guns to a battalion. A 105mm gun translates to roughly four inches, while 155mm is roughly a six-inch gun.

So a battalion of 105mm guns = 12 four inch guns, which is less firepower than three destroyers, each with four or five 5" guns. A 155mm battalion is roughly equivalent to a light cruiser. And one advanage the ships have over the land batteries is their mobility, and most importantly, their rate of fire. A ship is not just the guns, but all of the complex shell storage and ammunition hoists to feed those guns from the shell rooms. That firing system yields a rate of fire that cannot be duplicated on land.

Add to it the fact that NOTHING on land could duplicate the nine to twelve 12" to 16" guns of an American battleship. Not in terms of gun size, range, accuracy, concentration and rate of fire.

For those 82 days, the fleet stood off Okinawa pounding away. I wonder the tonnage of steel and high explosive rained down on Okinawa.

11 posted on 06/22/2015 8:47:30 AM PDT by henkster (Do I really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: henkster

This is all I could find in the brief time I have this morning:

“By the time the battle for the Ryukyu Islands ended American forces had expended 97,800 tons of ammunition, most of that tonnage in artillery. Indeed taking into account the size of the invading force, the length of the fighting front, and the duration of the campaign, the invading force’s concentration of naval, air, and ground fire unmatched in the history of warfare.”

http://www.history.army.mil/brochures/ryukyus/ryukyus.htm


12 posted on 06/22/2015 8:59:57 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Polling: The dark art of .turning a liberal agenda into political reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: henkster
I wonder the tonnage of steel and high explosive rained down on Okinawa.

Yesterday's thread included a comment by someone visiting years later who reported the ground completely covered by shrapnel.

14 posted on 06/22/2015 9:48:35 AM PDT by Hebrews 11:6 (Do you REALLY believe that (1) God IS, and (2) God IS GOOD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson