...sure, because they will be able to off load the massive medical payments for these relationships to the government.
the financial industry can applaud immorality all it likes...doesn’t make it right.
Will they feel this way about pedaphilia?
The financial industry obviously see money in their pockets because of the ruling.....
In today’s social/political climate, would any major company dare to say they opposed the marriage decision?????
I’m always puzzled about what has happened with marriage.
In 1996, the Defense of Marriage Act passed with overwhelming support, even among liberal members of Congress and Senate.
32 states out of 50 passed amendments to their constitutions defining marriage, often by huge margins.
Public opinion has definitely shifted on this subject in recent years. But the point is, even 15 years ago, most liberals who favored “gay rights” were not on board with same sex marriage as part of gay rights.
Homosexual marriage has gone in a short time from something which was unthinkable and had support only among the liberal fringe, to something which has now been imposed by the Supreme Court. And if you can believe public opinion polls, a slight majority of people now support homosexual marriage.
God is going to punish them, and our nation, with Economic Collapse.
God is going to punish them, and our nation, with Economic Collapse.
Sure they do. They give more to Hussein Obama than conservative candidates.
occupy wall street clowns had it so backwards.
Uh...I thought it was more like 2% to 3%?
This is what I have be3ensayiang for a long time. Big business and other business used to be our friends but they aren’t any longer. Under no circumstances should we support tax cuts, deregulation or other business welfare unless they accept our rules and that should be it.
It is not “gay” marriage. It is same-sex marriage.
The difference.
The traditional marriage laws restrict everyone (heterosexual and homosexual) to the same rules. You can only marry one person of the opposite sex, who is willing, of age, and not related, etc. Two men who were heterosexual (best buddies) could not marry even if they wanted to. Their “orientation” was irrelevant. It was based upon their both being the same sex.
Even “gay” people were free to marry according to these rules.
But that wasn’t enough. They wanted extra marriage rules.
Now they can marry someone of the same sex.
We never discriminated against them. We never discriminated against their “orientation.” We simply said that marriage is as God defined it (between opposite sexes).
*subject to change without a moment's notice.
In sum: more taxpayer funds will be spent and they’ll get a cut.
More government spending, more debt- Hooray!
This is how you know you are living in a socialist country.
Businesses, operating within a free and competitive market, succeed by having a better product and keeping its customers happier than its competitors.
In a socialist or communist country, businesses must make political calculations, not market ones, because they rely on the government to succeed. If you don’t have friends in the government, or worse, have enemies, you WILL fail.
Note, a free market is not an anarchal one. You still need justice to deal with cases of fraud, for example. Hence the concept of limited government.
The US socialist government, goes far beyond this though and businesses must blow with the wind, which, for now, is on the side of gay marriage.
This is also why they hopped on the confederate flag bandwagon, by the way.
Can you imagine this business behavior, say 40 years ago:
“Coke applauds the removal of US troops in Viet Nam”
For a slightly different perspective, ya, I know it’s the ‘crazed’ Ticker guy, but is this site not a ‘marketplace of ideas’??? or not....——http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=230275
5.56mm
A thumbs up from mammon...big surprise.
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
Well, this is a simple boycott opportunity. Can they survive without conservative cash? They seem to think so.