Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Erik Latranyi
In 16th-century England, the age of consent was set at 10 years
Because their life expectancy was age 30. (10-15 years less than Rome).

In 1875, parliament raised the age of consent to 13; Life expectancy was about 40 as in in 1885.

Given our life expectancy, we should be RAISING the age of consent. Either that or my wife's cooking magazines are right and the hormone/antibotitic/genetic crap we are eating are making our kids mature earlier.

19 posted on 06/28/2015 5:33:30 AM PDT by DCBryan1 (No realli, moose bytes can be quite nasti!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DCBryan1
Because their life expectancy was age 30. (10-15 years less than Rome).

Only because of higher infant mortality. Those who survived past childhood had about the same anticipated lifespan.

I think you may be confused about lifspans in Rome. Let's leave aside that a very high percentage of babies were intentionally killed, which would dramatically increase mortality. Here's an interesting table. Seems awfully precise for a period about which we have limited data, though.

http://www.richardcarrier.info/lifetbl.html

32 posted on 06/28/2015 6:07:32 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson