Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can a Texas county clerk refuse to issue a gay marriage license? It’s complicated.
Washington Post ^ | 06/29/2015 | Philip Bump

Posted on 06/29/2015 8:26:02 AM PDT by GIdget2004

Ruthann Robson, distinguished professor of law at the City University of New York, explained the question at greater length when we spoke by phone. Whether or not an individual county clerk is allowed to deny a license on religious grounds "is still unresolved," she said. When New York passed its same-sex marriage law several years ago, some clerks resigned rather than issue licenses after Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) said that accommodation was not an option. In Alabama earlier this year, however, the high court allowed religious objections. (Paxton himself notes that clerks deciding against issuing licenses "may well face litigation and/or a fine.")

For an accommodation to be made, certain questions arise. "Is their religious belief substantially burdened?" Robson asked. "Is it overridden by their status as a public employee? Where is that line? Because as a public employee, you swear to uphold the Constitution." Public employees "don't have full 1st Amendment rights," she said, "because it's balanced against the interest of their employer, which in this case is the government."

What's not allowed, in Robson's estimation, is for a clerk to shut down the issuance of licenses across the board over a personal objection. "The question in terms of accommodation has to do with individuals," Robson said. "So if the entire courthouse closed, that would not be an accommodation."

In that case, the Supremacy Clause kicks in.

The Supremacy Clause, in Article VI of the Constitution, delineates that the Constitution is the "supreme law of the land." Tension between the power of the federal government and individual states is as old as the country itself. Even when something is mandated by federal law -- or by the Supreme Court -- states have often tried to work around it.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/29/2015 8:26:02 AM PDT by GIdget2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

States Rights started the last one. Deja vu all over again.


2 posted on 06/29/2015 8:27:35 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Just do it. Civil disobedience or lose the war that SCOTUS has declared on Christian society.


3 posted on 06/29/2015 8:28:28 AM PDT by Pelham (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

I’m thinking if the form has male/female name on them instead of partner1/partners they need the time to reprint them; say, oh fifty or sixty years?


4 posted on 06/29/2015 8:28:55 AM PDT by SkyDancer ( I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Just do it


5 posted on 06/29/2015 8:28:59 AM PDT by expatguy (Donate to "An American Expat in SE Asia")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

gay marriage is not going to work anyway , Gays only want to find as many sexual parters as possible and not stick to one parter ,I think it’s part of the Disease


6 posted on 06/29/2015 8:29:38 AM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Get the states out of the business of issuing marriage licenses.


7 posted on 06/29/2015 8:32:12 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (A free society cannot let the parameters of its speech be set by murderous Islamists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
Civil disobedience or lose the war that SCOTUS has declared on Christian society.

Far too much sacrifice required here. I mean, GASP! we may lose our jobs, our homes, our cars, our big screen TV's and the booze we drink while watching the big game! What, are you crazy to put all that at risk?

8 posted on 06/29/2015 8:34:20 AM PDT by dware (Yeah, so? What are we going to do about it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dware

The possibility of losing a job is no small thing and the fear of it is what will keep a lot of people quiet and obedient to their sodomy marriage overlords.


9 posted on 06/29/2015 8:45:36 AM PDT by Pelham (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

State Rights started what last one?


10 posted on 06/29/2015 8:49:05 AM PDT by Team Cuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004
"...certain questions arise. "Is their religious belief substantially burdened?" Robson asked."

The SCOTUS resolved nothing but to reinforce the battle on 'equal rights" in their/our Constitution...those words must be in there somewhere or all those erudite findings to give religious rights away would not have been made............ummmmmm 'er

11 posted on 06/29/2015 8:53:14 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Similarly “complicated”: assassinating a president.


12 posted on 06/29/2015 8:59:23 AM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3305675/posts?page=4#4

About the forms, you are correct about what’s on them; some counties in tx don’t have the right verbiage
..


13 posted on 06/29/2015 9:01:59 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

IIRC forms can’t accommodate the new ruling


14 posted on 06/29/2015 9:02:42 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004
In that case, the Supremacy Clause kicks in . . . delineates that the Constitution is the "supreme law of the land."

How cute! After eviscerating the real, written Constitution, America's enemies are appealing to the literal words of the Constitution to enforce their demands on the same issue. No, thank you. The rule of law is dead, and we are all stuck with the rule of force.

If Obama wants to call out the Texas National Guard (as if Texans would Obey Obama) or send United States Marshals to Texas and have them point guns at county clerks in Texas, he's welcome to try, but (1) I would hope that Obama isn't ready to cross that line, yet, and (2) I would hope that the Marshals are smart enough not to try that in Texas. Short of force, Obama can do nothing.

This is not integration, where the people being escorted were cute and had a reasonable request.

These are revolting perverts who disgust the vast majority of the population. Force in an immoral and unlawful effort to exert federal jurisdiction outside the Enumerated Powers would not go well, particularly in Texas.

Note: I am not advocating violence, just the reverse. I am pointing out that violence by America's enemies would fail, at least in Texas. I am not even advocating disobeying any constitutional law, just pointing out that our government derives its just powers from the consent of the governed, not from the orders of a politicized Supreme Court that has given up its legitimacy.

15 posted on 06/29/2015 9:14:30 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

Yeah, seriously. These questions are idiotic.

“Do I have legal permission to be civilly disobedient?”

Uhhh.....


16 posted on 06/29/2015 9:16:40 AM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
The possibility of losing a job is no small thing and the fear of it is what will keep a lot of people quiet and obedient to their sodomy marriage overlords.

On this, and many other issues. I reject the notion that somehow, we are "better" than the Founders, who all sacrificed jobs, homes, families, farms, $$$ and in many cases, their lives. We should be ashamed of ourselves.

17 posted on 06/29/2015 9:18:24 AM PDT by dware (Yeah, so? What are we going to do about it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dware

People are going to have to summon the courage to defy this totalitarian decision by the Court.


18 posted on 06/29/2015 9:36:53 AM PDT by Pelham (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57

I’ve read where some birth certificates don’t have mother/father but parent1/parent2 ... sad.


19 posted on 06/29/2015 9:57:35 AM PDT by SkyDancer ( I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Reports this morning from Kentucky saying that at least three county clerks are refusing to issue any marriage licenses rather than issue them to lesbian or gay couples.


20 posted on 06/29/2015 10:16:59 AM PDT by brothers4thID (Be professional, be courteous, and have a plan to kill everyone in the room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson