[buckalfa]

http://blog.alliancedefendingfreedom.org/2015/02/18/5-answers-to-frequently-asked-questions-about-kelvin-cochran-atlanta-fire-chief-firedforfaith/

Try this (apologies for being Amish). The city maintains they have a right to approve, the Chief claims discrimination against his beliefs which to me is obvious. The case actually carries more significance now given the resent SCOTUS ruling on gay marriage.

[Bob]

Thanks for the link but it contradicts your previous post that his employee contract required city approval of his publishing a book:

Q: Didn’t Chief Cochran need the mayor’s permission to publish his book?

A: No, because the city does not have a policy requiring the mayor’s approval before city employees may publish a book. And if the city did, it would violate city employees’ free speech rights. The First Amendment is the only permission slip Kelvin Cochran needed to write and self-publish a non-work-related book on his own time. People don’t lose their right to free speech just because they work for the government.

I'm also a bit confused by your posting "(apologies for being Amish)". I'm unclear on what you mean by that.