Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hondact200

Righto. Sadly, that way of life was based on slavery, as they themselves repeatedly said.

Feel free to point out exactly how the central government was lording it over the South in 1860.

In actual fact, southern Democrats walked out of the Democratic Party convention in 1860 (twice) over refusal of northern Democrats to bow to their demand for a federal Slave Code imposing slavery in every territory, regardless of whether the inhabitants wanted it or not.

So there is actually a better case that the South seceded because they didn’t get the expansion of federal power they wanted.


36 posted on 07/07/2015 5:01:54 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan

South - One crop Cotton. Eli Whitney Cotton Gin streamlined cotton in being able to remove seeds more quickly. The South was not able to sell cotton to other countries. Cotton was only able to be sold to the Northern textile industry.

The south had no industry - there was no manufacturer of ammunitions, steel, or any other manufacturing. The South started its own iron works when the vote for secession went into place.

The South wanted to export cotton.


60 posted on 07/07/2015 5:57:15 AM PDT by hondact200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan
So there is actually a better case that the South seceded because they didn’t get the expansion of federal power they wanted.

You mean they took the choice of having even less Federal power? How does that make any sense?

105 posted on 07/07/2015 8:22:51 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson