Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ilgipper

“The idea that we undo what’s been done by separating marriage and civil unions is frankly 5 years too late. The court has spoken so we mush re-write the rules”

What if this were the mindset following the Dred Scott decision? Or Prohibition?


11 posted on 07/07/2015 8:45:55 AM PDT by Reddy (B.O. stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Reddy
What if this were the mindset following the Dred Scott decision? Or Prohibition?

Those were fixed by democratic means. The Supreme Court short-circuited democracy in the SS marriage case so that will have to be fixed by democracy (e.g. Article V) as well.

43 posted on 07/07/2015 10:37:32 AM PDT by palmer (Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet into FlixNet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Reddy

Prohibition was imposed on the country by Constitutional Amendment, not the courts. And then it was codified by Congress. It’s an example of how the people and states can also be terribly wrong.


52 posted on 07/07/2015 5:49:33 PM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson