I’m a regular listener of Mark Levin. I don’t need an Article V education. Mark is wrong but so invested in his idea he won’t see any downside to it. I agree it is legal but I think people are extremely naïve to think they can control the ends or that new laws will make lawless people into lawful people.
So what are you going to do? Tell liberals they can’t attend, or have opinions? Quite frankly, if this convention is as well controlled and orchestrated as you believe, then is it not you trying out for tyrant?
Do the people have a God given right to design their government?
So, you don’t need an education on the Article V process because you’re a regular listener of Mark Levin’s? Obviously you’ve been sleeping through class because your fallacious arguments have been addressed many times before by Mark.
You’re misrepresenting the situation regarding Article V and trying to pass it off as analysis. First your false contention that, to make the case that the Article V process will not be a ‘runaway’ process means that it must therefore be a form of tyranny, is absurd. Tell that to the framers who created the provision. So it will be a form of tyranny to propose amendments that still need to be approved by 3/4 of the states? Even those that would be approved by the convention would still have to be agreed to by 2/3 of the state delegations present. On a state by state basis, we are much more Red than we are Blue.
By the way, are you against any new amendments to the Constitution or just those that are proposed through Article V?