Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/10/2015 6:35:05 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer

So where is the NY Times outrage over sanctuary cities?


2 posted on 07/10/2015 6:37:03 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
These public employees seem to forget that taxpayers pay them to do their job.

And those in my state who are resisting an illegal, made-up "law", are doing exactly what I expect them to.

3 posted on 07/10/2015 6:38:21 AM PDT by grobdriver (Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Letting Muslims claim broadly available religious exemptions from generally applicable laws or work rules

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/02/20/letting-muslims-claim-broadly-available-religious-exemptions-from-generally-applicable-laws-or-work-rules/


4 posted on 07/10/2015 6:39:10 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Tough guys prosecute/persecute bakers. Trespassers/illegal aliens/undocumented residents? What’s that?


5 posted on 07/10/2015 6:39:24 AM PDT by rktman (Served in the Navy to protect the rights of those that want to take some of mine away. Odd, eh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

7 posted on 07/10/2015 6:40:00 AM PDT by mrmeyer (You can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him. – Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

NYT is cracking down on those who choose which laws they will and will not obey! Obammy better watch it LOL.


8 posted on 07/10/2015 6:40:28 AM PDT by OSHA (One despises and wants to destroy the United States, the other is a dead terrorist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Uh, Sanctuary States for marriage is wrong?


9 posted on 07/10/2015 6:41:13 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Government employees do not have a constitutionally protected right to pick and choose which members of the public they will serve, no matter their religious beliefs.

Tell that to Obama and his cabinet, who routinely pick and choose which laws and which members of society they will work to benefit.

The Constitution’s protection of religious freedom simply does not include the right to discriminate against others in the public sphere.

Let's see if you remember this maxim when your gay allies start persecuting Christians for their Biblical beliefs about marriage. And Muslims, too.

12 posted on 07/10/2015 6:43:38 AM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

What about Washington DC and Chicago ignoring the Heller decision on the Second Amendment?


13 posted on 07/10/2015 6:43:39 AM PDT by Thunder90 (All posts soley represent my own opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Wow, on top of them ignoring sanctuary cities and probably 100 other laws that the government breaks, is the NYT usurping the role of SCOTUS? What's up with the shrill, "they must stop!" stuff?
14 posted on 07/10/2015 6:45:20 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Boo hoo. The Slimes has their panties in a wad because America won’t bend the knee to their evil god.


15 posted on 07/10/2015 6:46:14 AM PDT by Dr. Thorne (The night is far spent, the day is at hand.- Romans 13:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Screw the HOMOs....WE NEED A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT!!


16 posted on 07/10/2015 6:48:55 AM PDT by hapnHal (hapnHal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The Supreme Court does not make law. The have overstepped their Constitutional authority, and those tryin to “create” law must be impeached.


17 posted on 07/10/2015 6:49:24 AM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Restore Liberty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

San Francisco refused to comply with federal immigration laws and Kathryn Steinle is dead. Americans are killed and maimed every day by “undocumented immigrants”.

Why is it that the highest court in the land, packed by Democrats, says that homosexuals have the “right” to marry, but every day Americans are denied their constitutional right to life, liberty and property because of illegal defiance of law by Democrats and their friends across the aisle?


18 posted on 07/10/2015 6:51:38 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
The Supreme Court could not have been clearer legally out of bounds when it ruled late last month that states may not refuse to marry same-sex couples.
19 posted on 07/10/2015 6:52:25 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (Even the compassion of the wicked is cruel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

And here I thought the employer, including government, was to give reasonable accommodation to an employees religious belief.


21 posted on 07/10/2015 6:53:14 AM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The hypocrisy is breathtaking. As has been noted above, Obama flat out said he will not be enforcing the law with regard to immigration and will also be imposing an illegal executive amnesty. We also have the sanctuary cities. How can anyone take the Times seriously?


22 posted on 07/10/2015 6:53:29 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
This article is proof positive that the USSC has taken down the "wall of separation between church and state", and can NO LONGER BE USED AS AN ARGUMENT AGAINST THE CHRISTIAN !!!

It is gone !


If they can bring someone up on charges for ERECTING A WALL BETWEEN CHURCH AND STATE, the argument no longer exists


Retro-actively;

What about every court case adjudicated BECAUSE of that so-called Constitutional stand ?

Popcorn almost done ....

23 posted on 07/10/2015 6:53:33 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true, I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

It’s not a matter “religious liberty”. It is freedom in general. The freedom to associate with whom we want. The freedom to do business with whom we want. The right to use and control our property as we see fit.
Get up off your knees and stop whining about religious liberty and demand liberty.


24 posted on 07/10/2015 6:58:56 AM PDT by all the best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

What was illegal was that decision. Regardless, I thought we got to pick and choose the laws we like. I learned that from publications like the NYTimes.


25 posted on 07/10/2015 7:00:29 AM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson