Skip to comments.
Warning to Republicans: Don't Go Too Far on Trump Bashing
Rush Limbaugh.com ^
| July 13, 2015
| Rush Limbaugh
Posted on 07/13/2015 2:02:50 PM PDT by Kaslin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
To: WayneS
Ill promise not to go overboard on Trump bashing if his supporters will promise to stop going overboard on claims he is some kind of life-long staunch über-conservative. I've read just about every Trump thread, and I've never heard any of his supporters make such a claim. I've heard many of his detractors claim he's a life-long staunch uber liberal, not to mention a Hillary shill. Either claim is absurd. But he may yet turn out to be the best viable alternative.
41
posted on
07/13/2015 4:04:36 PM PDT
by
Hugin
("Do yourself a favor--first thing, get a firearm!",)
To: Jim Noble
Im not confident about Cruz mechanics, and I think the wife is a big problem.
Anyone concerned about Cruz and not Trump isn't really going to be taken seriously but those who attack the wives are the lowest form of scum.
42
posted on
07/13/2015 4:04:38 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Sad fact, most people just want a candidate to tell them what they want to hear)
To: DoughtyOne; DannyTN
Reagan was also a party outcast...Even his own VP (George Bush SR) despised his "VooDoo economics".
The only reason GHW Bush was elected was because of Reagan...sadly Bush was too stupid to know it, hence one term.
43
posted on
07/13/2015 4:46:20 PM PDT
by
lewislynn
( Hillary = Obama in a pantsuit)
To: lewislynn
Bush was on Reagan’s ticket because the same bunch of high end trash in New England controlled the party’s purse, the party’s publicity and party’s patronage. Reagan did himself good by forcing them to acknowledge that he controlled the desires of the masses and all the other stuff was wind without him. As I recall, to be corrected, Reagan and the Bush family were not soul buddies.
To: cripplecreek
Listen, brother, whether or not I’m “the lowest form of scum” is subjective, BUT - the Democrats are going to nominate either Elizabeth Warren or someone else who is going to run against the money center banks - and if you think nominating a man whose wife is a managing director of Goldman Sachs (that’s not an “attack”, BTW, that’s a fact) to run against Warren or whomever - if you think that’s not going to become the centerpiece of the campaign, you’re nuts.
By the way, cripplecreek, I like most of your opinions and I would never call you scum over something like this.
45
posted on
07/13/2015 5:01:33 PM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain.)
To: Kaslin
Then that bastard Mexican Doctor pushed my prostate real hard! That's the first guy I am gonna kill when I am president!
46
posted on
07/13/2015 5:02:20 PM PDT
by
right way right
(Disclaimer: Not a prophet but I have a pretty good record.)
To: Jim Noble
I don’t really care what you like. Anyone who attacks the wives is bottom feeding scum.
47
posted on
07/13/2015 5:03:10 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Sad fact, most people just want a candidate to tell them what they want to hear)
To: cripplecreek
Yeah, but I didn’t attack Mrs. Cruz. The fact that she’s a managing director at Goldman Sachs is not an attack. The fact that it will be an issue in the campaign if Cruz is nominated is not an attack.
I hope she’s very successful. I don’t have any problem with what she does,
However, I think it’s a major problem for a would-be President in present conditions, and the time to think about it is now.
48
posted on
07/13/2015 5:16:13 PM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain.)
To: cripplecreek
Ted Cruz is married to a Capitalist???...there goes my vote!
I'm voting for Trump! He ain’t no...wait...never mind.
49
posted on
07/13/2015 5:23:37 PM PDT
by
right way right
(Disclaimer: Not a prophet but I have a pretty good record.)
To: right way right
I hear she secretly runs the illuminati from her laptop at her dining room table.
50
posted on
07/13/2015 5:25:06 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Sad fact, most people just want a candidate to tell them what they want to hear)
To: Kaslin
“Romney was on the way and then all of a sudden Huckabee decided to get out and throw all of his delegates at the time, happened in West Virginia, I think, to McCain, which put McCain over the top. At that point Romney could have just launched on those two guys, and he could have told everybody what a bunch of reprobates he thought they were. But he didn’t.”
McCain ‘08 or in ‘12 or Romney ‘08 or in ‘12......Would it have made a difference? They both would have lost in either elections!
To: DannyTN
some of the GOPe are so vicious in their attacks on Trump that they end up throwing their support to a third party because they cant walk back their criticism of Trump.Some of these RINO clowns who participated gleefully in destroying Sarah Palin would come away from bashing The Donald with Trump marks on their rumps. He is going to steamroller these smartass punks who think they know better than the voters.
52
posted on
07/13/2015 6:52:07 PM PDT
by
Albion Wilde
(If you can't make a deal with a politician, you can't make a deal. --Donald Trump)
To: Albion Wilde
I think some are already finding that out. In fact, I'm very confident of that.☺
53
posted on
07/13/2015 6:58:52 PM PDT
by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: WayneS
Ill promise not to go overboard on Trump bashing if his supporters will promise to stop going overboard on claims he is some kind of life-long staunch über-conservative. Way to go. Just completely ignore what is making Trump popular and reach across the aisle for some compromise pity.
54
posted on
07/13/2015 7:22:17 PM PDT
by
itsahoot
(55 years a republican-Now Independent. Will write in Sarah Palin, no matter who runs. RIH-GOP)
To: Hugin
I suppose I was exaggerating a bit. Perhaps it's more a matter of his supporters conveniently and completely ignoring his past liberal-ness than claiming he is a life-long conservative, but it amounts to essentially the same thing. Politicians who radically change their positions on important issues late in their lives/careers bother me. It is difficult for me to accept the change as sincere.
With that said, unless Ted Cruz starts really kicking ass, you may be correct about Trump ending as the only viable candidate.
55
posted on
07/14/2015 3:50:03 AM PDT
by
WayneS
(Yeah, it's probably sarcasm...)
To: itsahoot
How did you get that from my post?
Do you deny that up until relatively recently Trump held very different positions on immigration and gun rights than those he is currently espousing?
56
posted on
07/14/2015 3:53:08 AM PDT
by
WayneS
(Yeah, it's probably sarcasm...)
To: MN_Mike
Is Jeb the Bushwoman your gal?
57
posted on
07/14/2015 6:06:10 AM PDT
by
Mamzelle
To: cripplecreek
I don’t care much for Mitch mccinnell’s wife. And if Laura could have done a little housework, maybe W wouldn’t have had to throw the border open to coddle her laziness
58
posted on
07/14/2015 6:09:57 AM PDT
by
Mamzelle
To: Mamzelle
McConnell's wife is fair game because she was George W. Bush's Secretary of Labor.
-PJ
59
posted on
07/14/2015 6:23:27 AM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: DannyTN
Mississippi was it for me. There is no walking back the tactics the GOPe used to get Cochran reelected.
Nothing Republicans do will surprise me. Unless they actually govern according to their platform—then I suppose I’d be shocked.
60
posted on
07/14/2015 6:35:00 AM PDT
by
Nickname
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson