The candidate who would likely benefit the most from conservatives uniting behind someone early is Ted Cruz. Cruz is the conservative warrior that should appeal to conservative activists and evangelical voters at the same time. His campaign and Super PAC have raised impressive amounts of money, and Cruz himself has often made the argument that he is the conservative who could win the nomination. The problem for Cruz is that he has yet to assemble the type of campaign in Iowa it takes to win the caucuses.
1 posted on
07/15/2015 4:16:48 PM PDT by
iowamark
To: iowamark
2 posted on
07/15/2015 4:20:09 PM PDT by
iowamark
(I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy)
To: iowamark
The candidate who would likely benefit the most from conservatives uniting behind someone early is Ted Cruz.
The first and best reason to endorse Cruz. More bang for the buck.
3 posted on
07/15/2015 6:26:22 PM PDT by
fr1
(How long does this go-->Thank you for your contribution. Your comment has been submitted for review.)
To: iowamark
Cruz and Jindal have been my top two favorites for many months.
But, I can't get past Cruz's votes on
- the whole TPA/TPP debacle, where he voted for TPA and supported TPP until the very end (and besides, didn't he still vote for cloture, effectively paving the way for its passage?), and
- the Corker Bill, handing over the Constitution's treaty ratification powers to King O'bast*rd and clearing the way for Iran to develop nuclear arms.
So, help me out here. Cruz seems to be going squishy. What am I missing?
4 posted on
07/16/2015 11:14:24 AM PDT by
newgeezer
(It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson, 1824)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
