Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I wonder where the “estimated 15,000...now serving” came from?


4 posted on 07/16/2015 2:04:48 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GreyFriar

You would think the docs doing the physicals upon enlistment would spot the after market parts.


11 posted on 07/16/2015 2:07:44 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Sad fact, most people just want a candidate to tell them what they want to hear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: GreyFriar

Probably from the same study that claimes Trans’ are twice as likely enlist and serve as the average person. That is, another bit of advocacy scholarship.

BTW, I once broke down those alleged numbers. NPR and a couple other sources I looked at put total military personnel numbers (active and reserve) at a little over 2.2 million people. 15,000 transgendered troops would mean roughly 1 trans for every 150 people, or a % rate of about 0.7%, if my math is correct. That percentage is more than twice the unsubstantiated activist claim of 0.3%, and more than 3 times higher than the “best case” statistical research of a trans-activist named Lynn Conway, who found that the at most 1 in 500, and as few as 1 in 2500, less than 10 years ago. And that’s not even looking at the somewhat older, but non-partisan, studies in Europe that found it was closer to 1 in 30,000 for men and as rare as 1 in 100,000 in women.


25 posted on 07/16/2015 3:14:27 PM PDT by DemforBush (Ex-Democrat, and NotforJeb. Just so we're clear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson