Posted on 08/07/2015 9:51:13 PM PDT by Ray76
A federal appeals court on Friday said it will not reconsider a 2014 ruling that held Obamacare didn’t violate the Constitution’s “origination clause” requiring the House to kickstart revenue-raising bills, despite the law’s tax on people who do not obtain health insurance.
The issue split the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, however, and attorneys driving the challenge say they’ll fight on.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/8D88A83C3F0FA92C85257E9A00550930/$file/13-5202-1566781.pdf
Do you think if Obama was no longer in office the court would
have looked at the case?
Harry Reid and his goons authored that bill out of the senate. But it’s not a tax, right?
H.R. 3590--A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify
the first-time homebuyers credit in the case of members of the
Armed Forces and certain other Federal employees, and for other
purposes; to the Committee on Ways and Means
What the Senate returned to the House
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-111hr3590as/pdf/BILLS-111hr3590as.pdf
Since then Obama has repeatedly and illegally modified the Act that he signed into effect.
It's not a law. It's an assault.
The court is correct. The only basis for overturning the law is the old “Constitution.” This administration has proven that to be overtaken by events and no longer in force.
The law now is what the Democrats say it is.
The court is correct. The only basis for overturning the law is the old “Constitution.” This administration has proven that to be overtaken by events and no longer in force.
The law now is what the Democrats say it is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.