Posted on 08/09/2015 3:15:11 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
You’re spinning.
Give me links to all your claims of “strongly,” and “fact” that he “hired” Dayspring.
You’re an anti-Walker activist.
Cruz won’t go along with their open borders, gay marriage agenda. He’ll do just fine without their money.
Just another reason not to trust Walker. He is owned and will do what his big donors say.
Interestingly, I have never attacked you, but you did me. In fact, I have never, ever registered a personal attack on anyone here. But that’s OK. “I can’t get out of college” Walker is nothing more than a puppet, and a very stupid one at that.
Ever heard him speak? I have never, ever seen a deer in the headlights like Walker. Even here there are many who note that. There is also his changing positions with the wind.
Several GOPers have called him ‘Kind of a dumbass”
Walker is a moron. HE needs to get out of the way so we at least have a shot at the WH.
Thank you so much for your insightful commentary.
I disagree....you had mentioned you want a “Humble” President....and apparently see Walker as that and it’s fine that he meets YOUR ideal. But just because he claims conservative values we know he’s been wishy-washy on those and that’s simply a fact..... So it’s quite fair to name those areas..... No different then with those areas some might question about Cruz.
People are not “Trashy” Walker...they are naming issues and his stance as they see it.
There is no question Cruz meets fully conservative values....Walker is not on the same stage in that respect as his history shows.
BTW you would do well if you stopped assumptions regarding posters who disagree with...
Candidates are not perfect and because this is a Presidential run we have every right to vet all candidates ....some people here seem to think that means you don’t vet their choice or disagree with their take as they choose to view a candidate.
I’m a Cruz supporter and have confidence he has our best interests at heart and mind....I refuse to consider those who are trying to be what they are not. ...Example would be Carly....
Currently the GOP appears to be courting WAlker to team up with Carly as an alternative to Jeb. I will wait and see if Walker takes their bait or not....he’s said enough so far I’m not convinced he won’t jump in bed with them.
Okay.
: )
Thanks for hanging in there and making that clear.
WAlker hired Dayspring...we’ve got it here on FR
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3306869/posts
Really?
I guess Jack Cashill at the Am Thinker didn't get the memo.
"......Republicans have never been shielded from the media before. Why start now? I thought it a little unseemly for Trump to whine about his treatment and almost as unseemly -- not to mention sexist -- to rally around Megyn Kelly as though she were a little pink snowflake. Eric Erickson, there are no red tees on the campaign trail.
Going forward, we are going to hear that Fiorina is a little more keen on “diversity” than we would like her to be and that Carson is a little squishy on guns and that Walker is soft around the edges and that Rubio can be purchased and that Cruz, whatever his virtues, is not exactly eligible to be president.
Trump meanwhile, who has grown used to being the center square, will have to compete for votes like any other candidate. This will bore him to tears. He’ll drop out early and not waste his money on a losing third party candidacy.
Finally, Cruz will edge out Walker down the homestretch, pick Fiorina for his running mate, and wallop a Democratic candidate too busy apologizing to the Black Lives Matters crowd to mount a campaign.
In 2008, I wowed my friends by picking Sarah Palin for VP months before anyone outside of Juneau had heard of her. In 2012, I repeated the trick with Paul Ryan. Don’t believe anyone who tells you I bet on Bob Dole to win the 1996 election."
No matter how many times you post a lie, it is STILL A LIE!
**********
Super PACs
Super PACs, officially known as “independent-expenditure only committees,” may not make contributions to candidate campaigns or parties, but may engage in unlimited political spending independently of the campaigns. Unlike traditional PACs, they can raise funds from individuals, corporations, unions, and other groups without any legal limit on donation size.
**************
“WAUKESHA, Wisconsin — GOP presidential candidate Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker threw anti-conservative Brad Dayspring, who’s working for his Super PAC Unintimidated PAC, under the bus on Sean Hannity’s television program on Monday evening in an hour-long interview after announcing his White House run.
“Let me ask you about a hire of yours that has angered conservatives, it’s come up a lot in the news—Brent Bozell talks about Brad Dayspring as someone who besmirches the reputations of conservatives, that he’s paid to do the ugly work—do you pay attention to any of that, those criticisms?” Hannity asked Walker.
“Well, he doesn’t work for me, he works for the Super PACs out there and by ‘he doesn’t work for me’ I can’t tell any Super PACs anything,” Walker replied amid crosstalk.
Breit Bart had much to say of WAlker hirings....including DaySpring.....
Scott Walker hiring of the unstable Dayspring is an insult to honorable political discourse. If Dayspring is aligned with Walker, then conservatives should be warned to look elsewhere for leadership.”
You’re spinning.
Here, go chew on this:
Some people might excuse Scott Walker for this hire because he currently can’t coordinate with the PAC. But people in the know realize that’s a cop-out.
Who runs it.... The PAC is run by former high-level Scott Walker staffers who would NEVER deliberately do anything he doesn’t agree with...... Furthermore, you can be sure that there was PLENTY of coordination between Walker and his staffers right up until the moment he was legally unable to continue to do so.
Is it possible that he personally approved the hiring of someone like Dayspring beforehand? Absolutely, but a big part of the value of PACS like this one is that they create a degree of separation between the candidate and the PAC.
The PACs can run dirty ads and they can hire dirtbags who will undermine grassroots conservatives at every opportunity and supposedly, the candidate can’t be blamed.
Well, not this time.
Walker shouldn’t get a pass if his PAC keeps Dayspring on staff — and this is no small matter. If Walker becomes our nominee and wins the election, many of the staffers on his campaign and his PAC will end up working in the White House. The people holding those positions will have a tremendous impact on the sort of policies we’ll see. For example, one of the
Scott Walked did not hire Dayspring.
Dayspring does not work for Walker or his campaign.
Get another issue.
You have nothing.
Throwing out an article regarding Trump has nothing to do with my choice of a candidate....nor apparently yours for WAlker. This is about Walkers choice of his Pac using DaySpring and it sent ripples through the conservative base. That’s simply a fact.
Excusing him isn’t helping him...any more then his excuses for the other hires he’s had much difficulty with....he has a history of bad choices in that respect.
Therefore ‘it matters’ as this “weak point” in Walker in selecting such will be taking these folks with him to the Whitehouse if he wins.
Walker has no connection to any SuperPac, you know it, anyone who is informed knows it, all the candidates work under the same rules.
So go ahead and say it again, it appears you have nothing better to do but lie.
The PAC is run by former high-level Scott Walker staffers who would NEVER deliberately do anything he doesn’t agree with...... you can be sure that there was PLENTY of coordination between Walker and his staffers right up until the moment he was legally unable to continue to do so.
But, but, Trump wrote a book! And he inherited a lot of money! And he's been a republican for five whole years! And he hates Mexicans and Rosie O'Donnell!! And he only went bankrupt twice! And...and...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.