Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Planned Parenthood Applauds Trump’s Support For ‘Good Aspects’ Of Group
Daily Caller ^ | 8/11/15 | Derek Draplin

Posted on 08/11/2015 4:30:44 PM PDT by markomalley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: markomalley
But we have to take care of women. We have to absolutely take care of women. The abortion aspect of Planned Parenthood should not absolutely – should not be funded. -Trump

Trump understands how to win elections. He's going to get an amazing amount of women, black and hispanic vote for a Republican. And he is going to deserve that vote, because Trump will deliver on his promises.

41 posted on 08/11/2015 7:31:30 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Wow! I believe your position is called looking a gift hose in the mouth because you can elicit a holier than thou attitude. A man makes a sensible statement and condemns the act of abortion (perhaps not with spittle flying from his mouth, but still comes out against it) and instead of appreciating it, "Elite Christians" have to carp about it.

Question - what about the guy who can't go into jails anymore because he wouldn't sign a paper saying he wouldn't preach that homosexuality is a sin? I'd assume you think he was standing by his Christian principles and made the right choice. I see it as a cop-out and surrender because there is still plenty of opportunity to preach the Word and even the ills of sexual impurity without focusing on homosexuality. If we "stand by our Christian principles" by deciding it's better to forego carrying the Word because we can't carry every bit of it, we tell Jesus that one small aspect of the world is more important than carrying His message to everyone who may need it.

42 posted on 08/12/2015 2:35:28 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trebb
Trebb, you say:

Wow! I believe your position is called looking a gift hose in the mouth because you can elicit a holier than thou attitude. A man makes a sensible statement and condemns the act of abortion (perhaps not with spittle flying from his mouth, but still comes out against it) and instead of appreciating it, "Elite Christians" have to carp about it.

I don't know what The Donald believes. I'm not certain he knows what he believes.

OK, so I know people can change over time and that's fine. But when he flips and he flops, I'm not sure he actually has a stance. At the most conservative, he is pro-life with exceptions for rape, incest, and health of the mother. "Health of the mother" is simply a canard ("Doctor, I'm getting headaches. I need an abortion."). And that is the most conservative position he's taken.

To me, it sounds like he's a campaign pro-lifer. And while that's better than a campaign pro-abort, it doesn't mean that he is authentically pro-life.

There have been 1.3 billion (yes, BILLION) abortions around the world since 1980. If pro-life is not an issue to take a stand on, I do not know what is.


Trebb, you said:

Question - what about the guy who can't go into jails anymore because he wouldn't sign a paper saying he wouldn't preach that homosexuality is a sin? I'd assume you think he was standing by his Christian principles and made the right choice.

St Polycarp lived between 70 AD and 155 AD. His death gives us an example:

Polycarp was arrested on the charge of being a Christian -- a member of a politically dangerous cult whose rapid growth needed to be stopped. Amidst an angry mob, the Roman proconsul took pity on such a gentle old man and urged Polycarp to proclaim, "Caesar is Lord". If only Polycarp would make this declaration and offer a small pinch of incense to Caesar's statue he would escape torture and death. To this Polycarp responded, "Eighty-six years I have served Christ, and He never did me any wrong. How can I blaspheme my King who saved me?" Steadfast in his stand for Christ, Polycarp refused to compromise his beliefs, and thus, was burned alive at the stake.

You are asking that Christian to offer just a tiny pinch of incense. If you take a look at a lot of Catholic Bishops, like Dolan, Cupich, Wuerl, et al, they have offered just a tiny pinch of incense themselves. And there are plenty of Prostestants who have that same attitude themselves (not being Protestant, it would be presumptuous of me to name names).

I would, if I was in that position, prefer to be like Polycarp. Consider this: But Peter and the apostles answered, “We must obey God rather than men." (Acts 5:29)

43 posted on 08/12/2015 2:57:28 AM PDT by markomalley (Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good -- Leo XIII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Peter was right about obeying God vs. men, but the guy wasn't asked to support homosexuality, just barred from focusing on it as a sin - Paul liked to 'infiltrate cultures by becoming like the people of that culture so he could be more effective in carrying the Word. How can making a choice that negates one's ability to carry the Word be "the more noble and God-obedient" way?

I can understand some folks "ideals" but it seems to me that only real use we can be to God is to reach out to people with His Word and the Good News of the Gospels. You can teach/preach about the incredible sacrifice of Jesus w/o focusing on homosexuality. In this case, homosexuality wins by preventing the carrying of God's Word and Salvation because one is so obsessed with homosexuality that it' omission for an environment's preaching is a game stopper.

44 posted on 08/12/2015 4:24:12 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: trebb
You can teach/preach about the incredible sacrifice of Jesus w/o focusing on homosexuality.

You changed the parameters. Originally you said, what about the guy who can't go into jails anymore because he wouldn't sign a paper saying he wouldn't preach that homosexuality is a sin?

In the original case, you are talking about a person who is being required to bury the fact that homosexuality is a sin. In your modified case, you are talking about one who is focused only on that topic.

If you must agree not to preach (at all) on an uncomfortable subject, be it couples shacking up, homosexuality, talking about money or even about the Cross, then you are, in effect, being required to deny the gospel.

45 posted on 08/12/2015 4:34:21 AM PDT by markomalley (Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good -- Leo XIII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Trump stands for nothing if you look long and close enough at him. Forget flipfloping, he is just quicksand.

Trump fans just keep turning a blind eye to it and parroting my tagline in one fashion or another.


46 posted on 08/13/2015 4:50:14 PM PDT by LowOiL ("Let us do evil that good may come"? ....condemnation is just - Romans 3:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson