Agreed. It would better to support someone who doesn’t take a strong position on immigration, rather than support someone who does, but doesn’t present 100% of the details in the first position paper they publish on it.
The stupid....it hurts!
We all know full well that an army of immigration attorneys and the ACLU will file a confetti of lawsuits and injunctions to stop the Donald in his tracks and they will have the support of obliging lower federal courts.
He needs to tell us:
1. How does he plan to identify, apprehend, and deport all illegals?
2. Dreamers will claim that they have been provided “vested rights” and it is unconstitutional to retroactively take this away from them.
3. K-12 education is a constitutional interpretation.
4. Birthright citizenship is a constitutional interpretation.
5. Right to medical treatment, even no-essential medical care, is a constitutional interpretation.
Simply declaring that he plans to move mountains (albeit a good start) is simply an illusion without specifying realistic methods and means to achieve this.