Posted on 08/28/2015 6:13:14 AM PDT by servo1969
Author’s Note: The following column is comprised of excerpts taken from my first lectures on the first day of classes this semester at UNC-Wilmington. I reproduced these remarks with the hope that they would be useful to other professors teaching at public universities all across America. Feel free to use this material if you already have tenure.
Welcome back to class, students! I am Mike Adams your criminology professor here at UNC-Wilmington. Before we get started with the course I need to address an issue that is causing problems here at UNCW and in higher education all across the country. I am talking about the growing minority of students who believe they have a right to be free from being offended. If we don’t reverse this dangerous trend in our society there will soon be a majority of young people who will need to walk around in plastic bubble suits to protect them in the event that they come into contact with a dissenting viewpoint. That mentality is unworthy of an American. It’s hardly worthy of a Frenchman.
Let’s get something straight right now. You have no right to be unoffended. You have a right to be offended with regularity. It is the price you pay for living in a free society. If you don’t understand that you are confused and dangerously so. In part, I blame your high school teachers for failing to teach you basic civics before you got your diploma. Most of you went to the public high schools, which are a disaster. Don’t tell me that offended you. I went to a public high school.
Of course, your high school might not be the problem. It is entirely possible that the main reason why so many of you are confused about free speech is that piece of paper hanging on the wall right over there. Please turn your attention to that ridiculous document that is framed and hanging by the door. In fact, take a few minutes to read it before you leave class today. It is our campus speech code. It specifically says that there is a requirement that everyone must only engage in discourse that is “respectful.” That assertion is as ludicrous as it is illegal. I plan to have that thing ripped down from every classroom on campus before I retire.
One of my grandfathers served in World War I. My step-grandfather served in World War II. My sixth great grandfather enlisted in the American Revolution when he was only thirteen. These great men did not fight so we could simply relinquish our rights to the enemy within our borders. That enemy is the Marxists who run our public universities. If you are a Marxist and I just offended you, well, that’s tough. I guess they don’t make communists like they used to.
Of course, this ban on “disrespectful” speech is really only illusory. The university that created these speech restrictions then turns around and sponsors plays like The Vagina Monologues, which is loaded with profanity including the c-word – the most offensive and disrespectful word a person could ever possibly apply to a woman. It is pure, unadulterated hypocrisy.
So, the university position can be roughly summarized as follows: Public university administrators have a First Amendment right to use disrespectful profanity but public university students do not. This turns the First Amendment on its head. The university has its free speech analysis completely backwards. And that’s why they need to be sued.
Before we go, let us take a few minutes to look at the last page of your syllabus where I explain the importance of coming to class on time, turning off your cell phone, and refraining from talking during lectures. In that section, I explain that each of you has God-given talents and that your Creator endowed you with a purpose in life that is thwarted when you develop these bad habits.
Unbelievably, a student once complained to the Department chairwoman that my mention of God and a Creator was a violation of Separation of Church and State. Let me be as clear as I possibly can: If any of you actually think that my decision to paraphrase the Declaration of Independence in the course syllabus is unconstitutional then you suffer from severe intellectual hernia.
Indeed, it takes hard work to become stupid enough to think the Declaration of Independence is unconstitutional. If you agree with the student who made that complaint then you are probably just an anti-religious zealot. Therefore, I am going to ask you to do exactly three things and do them in the exact order that I specify.
First, get out of my class. You can fill out the drop slip over at James Hall. Just tell them you don’t believe in true diversity and you want to be surrounded by people who agree with your twisted interpretation of the Constitution simply because they are the kind of people who will protect you from having your beliefs challenged or your feelings hurt.
Second, withdraw from the university. If you find that you are actually relieved because you will no longer be in a class where your beliefs might be challenged then you aren’t ready for college. Go get a job building houses so you can work with some illegal aliens who will help you gain a better appreciation of what this country has to offer.
Finally, if this doesn’t work then I would simply ask you to get the hell out of the country. The ever-growing thinned-skinned minority you have joined is simply ruining life in this once-great nation. Please move to some place like Cuba where you can enjoy the company of communists and get excellent health care. Just hop on a leaky boat and start paddling your way towards utopia. You will not be missed.
Thank you for your time. I’ll see most of you when classes resume on Monday.
Love this guy! I’d take his course just because he’s teaching it.
When is Registration Day ???
:)
“Feel free to use this material if you already have tenure.”
LOL
BRAVO!!!
Absolutely! I always enjoy reading his columns on Townhall, often times returning to previous missives. He would be my choice for DOJ.
The argument would be a bit more convincing if the author were not confusing atheists with Marxists.
More generally, a move civil defense of his position might be less emotionally satisifing, but more effective.
______________________
Don’t know about the author, when often I encounter such individuals in a position of authority - and especially in academia - they are prone to abuse it when someone states a contrary position.
Wilmington...this isn’t the guy they tried to fire because he converted to Christianity?
This works for me!
I don’t think the author did confuse atheists and Marxists. What was uncivil about this speech?
I thought he was moving to Pepperdine. Bummer.
Bookmarked
His Dad was a Dean of the college I went to. He is a very nice man. Worked VERY hard to get me in the right place to get my undergrad degree.
This, is how a man handles things.
I hope he does not abuse his power in a way that would offend constitutional civics.
I hope he allows leftist students to express their opinion and then he respectfully tells the truth as he sees it from a legal/constitutional point of view if there is a conflict.
Leftist professors and students have tried many times over the years, to get him fired for being a “conservative.” This is his way of letting them know that he’s not bending over to them so they can drop the class early and not get penalized. To me, one who knows and understands the original intent of the constitution is a “classical liberal.” That is a liberal before liberals went marxist.
I hope he does not abuse his power in a way that would offend constitutional civics.
I hope he allows leftist students to express their opinion and then he respectfully tells the truth as he sees it from a legal/constitutional point of view if there is a conflict.
Leftist professors and students have tried many times over the years, to get him fired for being a “conservative.” This is his way of letting them know that he’s not bending over to them so they can drop the class early and not get penalized. To me, one who knows and understands the original intent of the constitution is a “classical liberal.” That is a liberal before liberals went marxist.
If you find his comments coarse and offensive, you might be one of the people he’s talking to.
No he sued them about promotion,(Dr. Adams’ third book, Letters to a Young Progressive, was published in April of 2013. In 2014, Adams v. UNCW finally went to trial to determine whether the university violated the First Amendment in 2006 by denying his promotion to full professor in retaliation for his speeches and columns on TownHall.com. He was represented at trial by David French of the ACLJ and Travis Barham of ADF. On March 20th, the federal jury ruled in Adams favor. On April 8th, the court ordered UNCW to promote Adams and give him seven years back pay. He spent most of the money on guns made by Browning, guitars made by Fender, and amps made by Mesa Boogie.)
You can be written up and even terminated for saying something to which some thin skinned bully chooses to take offense, even when no offense was intended. Unless your know your co-worker well, your conversations are best limited to stuff which is work related, the weather and sports.
And I'm not so sure that even the weather and sports are safe topics.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.