Posted on 09/04/2015 1:53:10 PM PDT by Kaslin
RUSH: Okay, let's get... First, I think probably what everybody here wants some clarification on -- or at least some analysis of or explanation of or discussion of -- is Trump and his inability to identify certain names thrown at him on the radio, names of Al-Qaeda leaders, Hamas, Hezbollah, Iranian Quds Force leaders and so forth. It's real simple here, folks, and I guess I should address this to the Republican establishment and like-minded. If you think this is going to harm Trump with his supporters, it won't.
It didn't hurt George W. Bush when he was unable to do the same. It didn't hurt Ronaldus Magnus when he was unable to do the same thing. But it specifically isn't gonna hurt Trump's people because Trump, A, had a fairly decent answer. (summarized) "It doesn't matter. These guys are all gonna be gone by the time I'm elected." But, anyway, that's not the point. I want to get some historical perspective. Let's start here first off with what Trump said. This was on the Hugh Hewitt show last night. He's interviewing Trump.
This guy Hewitt, by the way, is one of the CNN moderators. He is the conservative Republican moderator CNN has chosen. He used to be in the Reagan White House. He's a graduate of Harvard. Solid guy, nice guy. No problem with Hugh Hewitt. He has his own technique, has his own way of doing his program and vetting presidential candidates. He asked the same questions later of Carly Fiorina. She was able to ace them all. So now we got comparisons, by the way.
"You know what? You know what?" they're saying in the Drive-By Media. "Why, this just like Sarah Palin! Sarah Palin, she didn't do the homework. She didn't study. She thought she could wing her way through and look what happened to her." They're saying that Trump is on the same path that Sarah Palin was on. Not, of course, noting the profound differences.
Anyway, here's the question. We have one of two. "At the debate..." Hugh Hewitt was telling Trump, "At the debate, I may bring up Nasrallah being with Hezbollah and al-Julani being with al-Nusra and al-Masri being with Hamas. Do you think if I asked people to talk about those three things and the differences, that that's a gotcha question?"
TRUMP: Yes, I do. I totally do. I think it's ridiculous. I'm a delegator. I find great people. I find absolutely great people and I'll find them in our Armed Services, and I find absolutely great people. When you start throwing around names of people and where they live and -- you know, "Give me their address" -- I think it's ridiculous. The names you just mentioned they probably won't even be there in six months or a year.
HEWITT: So the difference between Hezbollah and Hamas does not matter to you yet, but it will?
TRUMP: It will when it's appropriate. I will know more about it than you know -- and believe me, it won't take me long. It won't matter. I will know far more than you know within 24 hours after I get the job.
RUSH: By the way, you might think that Trump is putting Hewitt down. What he's actually saying is, "I'm gonna have some experts in there. We'll know everything there is to know about these guys 24/7 after I'm be elected. We're gonna know everything. We're gonna know everything we want to know. We're gonna know everything about who they are because we're gonna destroy them in the first 24 hours that I'm there. We're gonna get rid of them." That's the unspoken message that the Trump supporters will hear. So let's go back to November 4 of 1999. This is Boston on the educational staked WHDH TV. Political correspondent Andy Hiller is interviewing former governor of Texas, George Bush.
HILLER: Can you name the president of Chechnya?
BUSH: No. Can you?
HILLER: Can you name the president of Taiwan?
BUSH: Yeah, Lee.
HILLER: Can you name the general who's --
BUSH: Wait. Is this a 50 questions?
HILLER: No, it's four questions of four leaders in four hot spots.
BUSH: The new Pakistani general that's just been elected -- not elected. This guy took over office. He appears he's gonna bring stability to the country, and I think that's good news for the subcontinent.
HILLER: And you can name him?
BUSH: General... I can't name the general.
RUSH: Bush got away with it 'cause he called it "the subcontinent." See, only the insiders in foreign policy know what the hell "the subcontinent" is. Do you know what the subcontinent is, Snerdley? (interruption) You don't know what it is? (interruption) Are you kidding me? You don't know what the subcontinent is? This is my point. I remember. I'm gonna get back to Trump here just a second, but when this all happened I remember Condoleezza Rice.
They sent her out for damage control after this and she kept using the term. "The governor was clear in his understanding of the subcontinent and the issues of the subcontinent and what was happening in the subcontinent," and I'm thinking, "Okay, I know what the subcontinent is, but nobody ever talks about it except in these circles." This is sort of like foreign policy lingo they're entitled to use but you aren't.
Not that you're not entitled. They use and you don't. It's one of those words or ways of referring to a geographical place on the planet that lets you know, "These people are special. They are talking about the subcontinent, and only real insiders do that." It's like the way economists talk about their business. They start throwing around these terms that most people don't know, and it lets you know that they are insiders and you aren't.
So Bush using the word "subcontinent" overcame all of the other things he wasn't able to answer because he knew what the subcontinent was; that meant he was schooled and of the right mind-set. (interruption) You still don't know what the subcontinent is? Do you know...? (interruption) Do you know what sub-Sahara is? What is it? (interruption) Right. Right. Sub-Saharan Africa is what? (interruption) No. No. No. (laughing)
Let me take a break here before.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: So when you talk about sub-Saharan Africa, most people when they hear the word "sub" (not all but a lot of people) think "substitute." "Okay sub-Saharan. Substituting what for Africa?" They don't get it. Rather than thinking of sub as in submarine, as in underneath. So sub-Saharan is about half of the continent, maybe a little bit more. It's the green part. It's everything below the Sahara Desert.
The Brits are responsible for this, folks.
The British and their foreign policy diplomats -- trying to distinguish themselves and the plebes that make up the rest of the world, don't you know -- created all these terms. The subcontinent is essentially India. You have Europe. It's just a blob up there. And you have this thing like an udder. It's sticking down there from the continent, and it's India. The subcontinent, it's beneath the continent. So to make themselves out to be really sophisticated, "Yes, of course! India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka? The subcontinent, don't you see?" So when Bush started talking about the subcontinent in that answer 2000, I knew it was okay.
And then Condoleezza Rice went out doing damage control, and she kept talking about how (she kept calling him "the governor," 'cause that's what he was at the time, governor of Texas), "The governor is clearly versed on the issues ranging foreign ones subcontinent." She never defined what subcontinent was, never talked about it in the issues. Just kept using the term. So it was all okay. This was even done to Reagan, folks. Reagan was running for president.
He and the other candidates were asked if they knew the names of various obscure heads of state. These questions are never asked of Democrats, by the way. Make note of this: The question that Trump got, Democrats will never get those questions in the normal ebb and flow of things. Hillary will never get them. Clinton will never get 'em. Never did. It's just... They are questions that are designed to further the narrative that Republicans are just not bright; they're just not hip.
And when it works on one of them, then every other Republican is gonna start getting the same treatment. For example, if they can expose, say, a Sarah Palin who doesn't know an answer like this, "A-ha! Let's start asking the others, too." So Reagan got questions like this. He was asked to name various obscure heads of state. Reagan's answer was the best. Reagan said... I'm paraphrasing. He said, "It doesn't matter if I know their names. They need to know mine," and that shut it down. Trump saying, "It doesn't matter. They're not gonna be there by the time I get inaugurated, and even if they are, in 24 hours I'm gonna know more about these people.
"Because I'm gonna go out and I'm gonna find the wonks, and I'm gonna find the geeks. I'm gonna find the foreign policy experts are gonna tell me all about this. I'm a delegator. I'm gonna tell 'em to deal with it. We're gonna deal with it once and for all. Hamas, Hezbollah, what do you need to know? They're terrorist organizations, and they need to be wiped out. That's all anybody needs to know," and answers like that are gonna resonate. Trump's inability to name names or identify certain names? It's not gonna hurt him with his supporters.
One more theory on this and we're gonna keep going after this.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Now, one of the names that Donald Trump was given -- and he knew who he was. He was not stumped by this -- the head honcho, the leader of the Quds forces in Iran. That's the equivalent of their Delta or Ranger, SEALs, you name it, Special Forces, and this guy is an absolute bad guy. His name is General Qasem Soleimani. He heads the Quds forces.
Obama just lifted all sanctions on Soleimani and the Quds in this Iran deal. Part of the original sanctions prevented Soleimani from traveling and doing nuclear related business with, say, the Russians or anybody else. It was recognized what a viciously, dangerous bad guy he was and the sanctions limited his movement, if they abided by them. Those sanctions now have been lifted, and this guy, Soleimani, is free to travel all over. Obama (paraphrasing), "It's accidental. We didn't intend for this to happen," lifted all sanctions on Soleimani and the Quds in this Iran deal.
Soleimani is also the guy who sent all of the IEDs to Iraq that maimed and killed so many of our troops. Qasem Soleimani. He didn't personally manufacture them, of course, but he made sure that they got to Iranian allies in Iraq. These roadside IEDs, and positioned elsewhere, were used specifically to kill Americans and Iranians. So let me ask you, which is worse? Not knowing his name off the top of your head, but knowing who he is. Trump knew who he was, or is. But what's worse here, not knowing the name of this guy off the top of your head or rewarding him with sanctions relief, as the Obama administration has done.
I tell you, folks, there's even a part of me that is disgusted. I'm not sure if that's the right term. We have to know the names of these thugs, as though it's giving them some sort of respect? The only thing we need to know, and if identifying their names helps, is where they are so they can be targets. Every one of these groups, every one of these names, Al Zawahiri, everybody knows that Zawahiri inherited Al-Qaeda from bin Laden. Ayman al-Zawahiri, he's Egyptian. He's been running Al-Qaeda for 14 years essentially, even before bin Laden was captured and killed.
To the extent that these guys are known because they become targets, fine and dandy, but I guarantee you, I think the American people are sick and tired of these names. They're sick and tired of hearing about these names. They're sick and tired of nothing being done about these names, if you ask me. I would go so far as to say that a majority of the American people want these names out of our lives. The American people want something done about this. We're not fighting a War on Terror.
I haven't spoken much about this on this program, because it's a bit, I think, in the weeds for a lot of people.
I bet you Jimmy Carter could answer the questions! But do we want Jimmy Carter (or a micro-managing buffoon like him as president?)
How many times can this be posted?
Get HH off the air...!!
The "pop quiz" (interesting term seeing as how citizens should expect our candidates to actually know about the things they will be called upon to address while in office) won't hurt Trump. It's his incessant tantrum throwing when he's exposed as not being ready for prime time that will be his ultimate downfall.
In truth, that's too simplistic. There will be a lot of things that will be his undoing. His sophomoric ad hominems will just be part of what brings him down. I submit to you that at some point, the Trumpettes will decide they'd like to have an actual adult in the White House and come to their senses. Stamping your feet and running your mouth off is so juvenile, even the most juvenile among us will begin to get embarrassed.
And here's another thing. At some point, people will start to understand that the president will have to address other world problems and not just the wall at the border. To address them, they will have to have to understand them. Surely I can't be the only one who believes Trump didn't have a clue as to who Al Quds is. How embarrassing that he got them mixed up with the Kurds! I personally think he thought he heard something familiar that he "learned" about while watching military strategists and various pundits on TV and decided to jump in and show off his "knowledge" by pointing out that we're not doing right by the Kurds. I agree, but he was confused about who's who, and it was apparent to all who were tuned in. Now he claims that he misheard the question. Riiiiiiiight. If he'd misheard the question, he should have said so in the interview. He had to think of a good excuse overnight so he could save face. And besides, Hugh Hewitt was picking on him! That ol' meanie! He even he picked on Carly Fiorina after that! Yes, ladies and gentlemen, he picked on the girl! And the girl had an answer! Maybe that's why she's not whining today.
Interesting how our side has become the mirror image of the left.
My mistake. I just heard more of the interview than I had heard earlier. Apologies to Trump for my getting it wrong. He did, in fact, say that he misheard during the interview.
Now Carly has been quoted saying Trump should have known the answers, etc., etc., (like SHE did). However, Trump is still working, running multiple enterprises, while Carly is just largely running for political office. I want someone like Regan who will find the real experts and draw on their knowledge. I don’t expect the candidates to be able to know all about everything at this point. We have a glut of policy wogs in this country already, and they haven’t done much for us so far.
Rush is worried about losing audience. When his audience goes down he makes less money. Or maybe Trump has bought him off.
Don’t apologize. He did exactly what you said he did at first, and then tried to cover it up with the “I misheard you” approach.
And you’re quite right - it ought to be a big warning sign that he’s this thin-skinned when he’s shown to be ignorant on a topic. Say what you will about him, but HH is a well-known and well-regarded expert and scholar on Islamic extremism. I’m sure he views these questions as basic if you wish to take terrorism seriously. He asked these same questions to every Republican candidate, and they answered them without complaint. Trump looks like a fool for not only not knowing the answer, but for trying to fake his way through, and Hewitt’s suddenly the bad guy.
Trump is right, these guys are gonna change every six months. All we need to know about any of them is the GPS coordinate to put the missile on em.
Read your whole post. No point found. Wasted my time. But I am sure you feel special so all’s good.
I’m sorry for my post to you. It appeared as if I was attacking you.I don’t understand what you point was and I should have left it at that.
How dare he ask Trump a question he didn’t know the answer to!? Guy must be a dirty commie! Trump doesn’t need to know stuff, he’s got people for that.
Trump is a genuine American hero with a long history of social and economic conservatism, certainly not a flim flam man who supported single payer heath care until he decided to run as a Republican.
No problem. I have been attacked mercilessly and with vulgarity since I began posting my opposition to Trump. This was mild! I am a little surprised that I wasn't able to get my point across. Sorry I wasn't clear enough in my post.
Impy, you have certainly sized up Trump accurately! Everybody’s a jerk but him. And besides, he’s had many epiphanies over the past several years that have turned him into a conservative, and by golly, those conservative convictions are now part of his DNA — until they become burdensome.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.