To: wattsgnu
.....Orrrrr it could be a continuance of the fakery.
Call me with observable and repeatable results. Not before!
2 posted on
10/06/2015 1:42:59 PM PDT by
T-Bone Texan
(The economic collapse is imminent. Buy staple food and OTC meds now, before prices skyrocket.)
To: T-Bone Texan
We have been waiting since the mid 1980’s, no?
I was in a college Engineering Chemistry at the time when all this came out.
Ooooh, cold fusion, right around the corner!
3 posted on
10/06/2015 1:44:40 PM PDT by
SaveFerris
(Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
To: T-Bone Texan
No primary source to review. This could have been written by my loser nephew (except for the use of more-than-two-syllable words).
6 posted on
10/06/2015 1:47:42 PM PDT by
VanShuyten
("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
To: T-Bone Texan
But that is what the article is about...repeating it and observing, which they did and have a scientific explanation to go along with it! The point here seems to be that Pons and Fleischmann were unable to reproduce their results. They probably didn’t know about the impurity that allowed their system to work. Now it is known. At least, that is how I read it. But you are correct: If it is real, there will be more repeated experiments.
7 posted on
10/06/2015 1:47:44 PM PDT by
wattsgnu
To: T-Bone Texan
8 posted on
10/06/2015 1:51:53 PM PDT by
MarchonDC09122009
(When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
To: T-Bone Texan
"Call me with observable and repeatable results. Not "before! Read the slides.....several groups are showing 100% repeat-ability.
9 posted on
10/06/2015 1:53:05 PM PDT by
Wonder Warthog
(Newly fledged NRA Life Member (after many years as an "annual renewal" sort))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson