Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: InMemoriam
A comment on the site:

Gary Sellars • 10 hours ago

This article leaves obvious questions unasked. Is Olmp-K is a recognised slot, and has that slot been allocated for Russian use? I gather it must be, else the article would say so? Therefore what the #$%& is the problem??? Geo-stationary orbit is getting crowded these days, so unless those infernal Ruskies are stealing someone else's pre-allocated orbital slot, i don't see what the fuss is about. [Emphasis added]


16 posted on 10/11/2015 6:55:20 AM PDT by Crazy Jim (There are known unknowns and then there are unknown unknowns. - Donald Rumsfeld)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Crazy Jim

Good catch. One reason they might run the story even if the Russians took a nominally open slot is the close approaches - 10 km to the neighboring satellites and 5 km to a different unnamed satellite.

From the article:

Five kilometers is extremely close for geosynchronous satellites and usually requires satellite operators to closely work together to minimize the chance of a collision.


18 posted on 10/11/2015 7:41:34 AM PDT by InMemoriam (Scrape the bottom! Vote for Rodham!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson