Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

One thing is certain: if there is a war in the next few months, it is "come as you are." This is not WW II where we can produce the P-51 Mustang from drawing on a napkin to flying prototype in 102 days.

Besides the smallest Navy since WW I, a decimated Marine Corps, the Army only having a handful of Brigades combat ready, the Air Force smaller with an older fleet that at any time in history, the morale of the military is lower than it was post-Vietnam.

Morale is a massive factor in any fighting unit or army. Lord Nelson's fleet was outnumbered, but his men loved him, and he gave them better training. The British, with leadership, superior tactics, and fighting spirit destroyed the French and British fleets at Trafalgar 210 years ago this month.

The American military has been feminized, degraded, hamstrung, and smeared as a bunch of sexual harassers - all built on phony data and lies.

Critics try and compare military spending in Dollars between Russia, China, and the US. There are several fallacies to this argument.

One, we don't really know what Russia and China actually spend, we can only guess. Only the US is transparent with its actual Defense Spending.

Secondly, we compare apples to oranges. If a US factory produces a pair of boots that cost $150, a great deal of that cost was our way of doing business. Safety rules, union wages, legal costs, minority owned contracting privilege/profit by law, and on and on.

Russia and China don't play by those rules. They can produce the same or better pair of boots for $25 dollars.

On the battlefield, a bullet kills or maims the same, it does not discriminate about which costs more to produce.

4 posted on 10/11/2015 4:51:29 AM PDT by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SkyPilot

You are right about not eing able to directly compare cost

Chinese soldiers in Hong Kong make so little money per month they can’t afford to leave the base.

How many soldiers could the US field if it paid them $90.00 a month?


7 posted on 10/11/2015 4:56:37 AM PDT by Fai Mao (Genius at Large)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: SkyPilot
Lord Nelson's fleet was outnumbered, but his men loved him, and he gave them better training. The British, with leadership, superior tactics, and fighting spirit destroyed the French and British fleets at Trafalgar 210 years ago this month.

Lord Nelson, and his fleet, was British.

21 posted on 10/11/2015 5:19:14 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: SkyPilot

The British ... destroyed the French and British fleets at Trafalgar 210 years ago this month. ??


28 posted on 10/11/2015 5:33:32 AM PDT by arthurus (It's true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: SkyPilot
Armies and navies are invariably screwed up during peacetime. The officers become politicians and toadies and morale goes downhill.

However, when major war approaches, the chaff are thrown out and replaced with dedicated and competent patriots. Look at history, the armies of ancient Greeks, the Romans, and the Ruropeans.

37 posted on 10/11/2015 6:13:11 AM PDT by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: SkyPilot

He’s lowering the shields!


64 posted on 10/11/2015 7:49:45 AM PDT by infool7 (The ugly truth is just a big lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson