Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How the JFK Assassination Ushered in the Era of Modern Liberalism
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | October 19, 2015 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 10/19/2015 7:00:55 PM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 last
To: GunRunner

“There was no conspiracy, at least no evidence of one.”

The line says as “a result of a conspiracy”.

It is nice to know that you believe Hillary’s and Obama’s version of Benghazi. Nope, no conspiracy at all, and you are not going to be suckered in by conspiracy kookiness. Government people ALWAYS tell the truth.


81 posted on 11/24/2015 11:07:01 AM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: odawg
You should re-read your comments before posting. It was the government that said it was a conspiracy, so by definition I'm not believing what the government says.

Typical conspiracy kook. You can't keep your theories straight. I've heard the same fallacious argument a million times from 9/11 truthers. "Do you just believe everything the government tells you?! The towers were clearly blown up by controlled demolition!"

82 posted on 11/24/2015 12:23:36 PM PST by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner

“You should re-read your comments before posting. It was the government that said it was a conspiracy, so by definition I’m not believing what the government says.”

I read my comments before I post. Congress is composed of elected representatives, and these reps were not part of the cliche that put out the original lies. Not all elected reps are liars. Notice Sessions.

“Typical conspiracy kook”

You think you can evaluate me from this distance and sentences. You are not a kook, you are a fool.

“Do you just believe everything the government tells you?!

Well, punk. Do you?


83 posted on 11/24/2015 5:52:44 PM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Monterrosa-24; Clay Moore

>>Of course even Oswald could make those shots at those easy distances of less than 75 yards.

I’m not sure what you mean by “even Oswald.” He had been a Marine, and you didn’t get out of basic not being able to hit with iron sights at much greater distances than that. He would have been in Marine Basic c. 1957, so plenty of his DIs would have been hardened, no-BS Korean war veterans. They’d darn sure make sure he knew how to use a rifle before getting out of Basic.


84 posted on 11/24/2015 6:50:02 PM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Of course Oswald did it.

Even CSI could figure that out. I was well aware of Oswald as I lived in Irving and had friends who lived across the street from Marina.

It couldn’t be clearer. As to the shot, I looked down from the Sixth Floor museum through trees that were older and bigger than they were then. It was summer and the trees were also leafy. I could still have made that shot.

Why will people ... otherwise intelligent .. insist on a conspiracy. You cannot talk them out of it.

It’s like trying to talk a liberal out of global warming.

No facts penetrate.


85 posted on 11/24/2015 7:08:25 PM PST by altura (Cruz for our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; Dqban22

FR dqbqn22 wrote this last year, it needs to be repeated:

“Who ignore history is damned to repeat it.” George Santayana.

JFK’s “dreary account of mismanagement, timidity and indecision” as Eisenhower described his handling of the Bay of Pigs invasion emboldened the Soviets to install Nuclear missiles in Cuba the following year.

Khrushchev documents in his memoirs how Castro pleaded with him to launch a pre-emptive nuclear attack on the U.S. in October of 1962. The telegram making the plea sits in the Kennedy Library today. Some think Khrushchev’s fear of Castro’s officers somehow getting hold of the Nuclear buttons was a bigger factor in his decision to remove the Missiles than the “blockade” (in fact, 55 ships breached it) imposed by the Kennedy administration around Cuba at the time.

The prudence of Khrushchev’s decision was revealed the following month by Castro’s second- in - command, Che Guevara. “If the missiles had remained,” he told The London Daily Worker in November 1962 “We would have used them against the very heart of the U.S., including New York. We must never establish peaceful co-existence. In this struggle to the death between 2 systems we must gain the ultimate victory. We must walk the path of liberation even if it costs millions of atomic victims.”

He didn’t get his hands on the missiles but Castro emerged the big winner of the Missile Crisis. “Many concessions were made by the Americans about which not a word has been said...perhaps one day they’ll be made public,” said Fidel Castro in a speech in 1966.

“We can’t say anything public about this agreement. It would be too much of a political embarrassment for us.” That’s Robert F Kennedy to Soviet ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin in October of 1962.

The Cuban regime tried to obliterate New York and Washington with a nuclear attack during the October Missile Crisis of 1962. “In November 1962, the Castro brothers’ and Che Guevara’s agents had targeted Macy’s, Gimbels, Bloomingdales, and Manhattan’s Grand Central Station with a dozen incendiary devices and 500 kilos of TNT. The Holocaust was set for detonation the following week, on the day after Thanksgiving.” (Humberto Fontova)

Castro has been a strong ally of Islamic terrorism. Cuba continues to serve as a base for coordination and mutual support among transnational terrorist organizations. At Tehran University he stated to the thunderous applause of students and faculty, “The imperialist king will finally fall,” (AFP, May 10, 2001). Immediately afterward the Iranian Press Service proudly proclaimed that “Iran and Cuba reached the conclusion that together they can tear down the United States.” (IPS, May 10, 2001).

According to World renown and highly respected American investigative journalist and author, Claire Sterling, : “All of the world’s emerging terrorist bands in the 1970’s were indebted to the Cubans and their Russian patrons for that honeycomb of camps around Havana. None could have started without rudimentary training, and those who didn’t train in Cuba were trained by others who did.” (“The Terror Network, The Secret War on International Terrorism.”)

As reported by Sterling, “Castro was training the advance guards of the coming European fright decade – Palestinians, Italians, Germans, French, Spanish Basques – and forming guerrilla nuclei in practically every Western hemisphere state south of the American border. As far back as 1962, Castro’s camps were taking in 1,500 Latin American guerrillas a year. . ‘Any revolutionary movement anywhere in the world can count on Cuba’s unconditional support,’ declared Castro at the 1966 Tricontinental Conference in Havana”. It was then and there that the international terrorism network was consolidated under Castro’s leadership.”

Fidel Castro “jailed political prisoners at a higher rate than Stalin during the Great Terror. He murdered more Cubans in his first three years in power than Hitler murdered Germans during his first six. He came closer than anyone in history to starting a world-wide nuclear war.” Humberto Fontova. (http://www.carolinajournal.com/opinions/display_story.html?id=11121)

It is suicidal turning a blind eye to Castro, a deadly enemy at 90 miles south of Key West that does not hide his hatred for U.S.

After the restoration of diplomatic relations comes the end of the embargo.

To complete Obama’s betrayal of the American people, with the normalization of relations and reversal of the wet foot /dry foot policy comes the opening to Cuba of the American and International bank credits that will sustain the Cuban regimen passing to the American taxpayers the same heavy burden that helped to bankrupt the Soviet Union.

Don’t fool yourself, the hatred of the Cuban Stalinist regime towards U.S. remains the same today as 50 years ago, and Cuba was and remain a threat to the security of United. There is a Chinese spy base 50 miles of Havana and a Russian spy station in Havana outskirts. Both capable of listening or US. communications and cyber warfare.


86 posted on 01/14/2017 9:45:04 AM PST by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies ('45 will be the best ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson